The Friend Essay Samples Diaries

The Friend Essay Samples Diaries You might just have good friends that you are able to count on sometimes, but to be dependable on an individual and knowing they'll be there for you, it's difficult to find someone like that. In summary, being faithful, funny and friendly are definitely the most important features for a best friend. An individual who is not loyal isn't eligible for becoming even a friend. You are able to go and ask friends and family if you're being a very good friend or you may just sit down and assess yourself. A very best friend does not back away from you whenever you believe you've lost it. Second, acquiring a friendly friend makes me learn the way to deal with people. There's something about a very best friend that cannot be duplicated. A real friend is always prepared to obey whatever we wish to say. He is not a fair-weather friend. He is not scared to tell you what you're doing wrong. He is one of the most precious possessions that one can have in his life. Loyalty is a critical virtue for virtually any friendship. Friendship is among the most important values in our life. It is the most wonderful relationship that anyone can have. It is the relation which is not limited to any particular age group. Blogs about friendship is found using a search engine by employing some clever search strings. Be inclined to produce a challenging call If you believe your friend's safety is in danger, you may need to act without their consent and get assist. Our customer support will gladly tell you whether there are any special offers at the present time, and make sure you are getting the very best service our business can deliver. Being in the organization of that individual gives immense comfort. The Importance of F riend Essay Samples Sharing of private information is the toughest portion of somebody's life, but with buddies, it becomes quite easy. Trust good friends ought to be trustworthy. Personal and emotional you're writing to someone you've known for many years so that it won't be difficult to acquire emotional with them, open your feeling toward them and share. In the end, don't hesitate to share this article with family members and friends. People all feel overwhelmed sometimes. People that have many friends may find he or she doesn't need because many friends anymore. Thing is, great friends share. Speak to friends only once you have something nice to say. Whispered Friend Essay Samples Secrets College Essays Essay papers can about my very best friend essay be a good deal of unique types and all of them depend on your academic institution and the objective of the job. This essay will also assist you to prepare the ideal speech and also to compose a paragraph on my very best friend in your exams. Five unique essays are given within this section on the subject of A great friend'. Send this previous erev shabbos, essay describing a very best essay my very best friend rohit agarwal. Rumors, Deception and Friend Essay Samples You may always tell your trusted friend your flaws and remember your revelations are safe. It is extremely important to have somebody with whom you may share your thoughts freely. A lousy friend will always benefit from your kindness. Friends play a significant role in an individual's life. A great friend is an excellent blessing of God. A real Friend is the best gift of our life that is difficult to discover and after you get never let him go. A loyal friend always assists in need, care one another's feelings and shares secrets with no question. It is possible to also find a variety of discounts on our site which will help you to save some more money for future orders or anything you want to spend them on. O f course, occasionally a friend will go through a hard time, and we will need to be prepared and eager to hold a hand and offer a listening ear. True friend is the one, where the individuals do not need to maintain formalities with one another. A lousy friend will spread your business to everyone with the aim of make people believe they are much better than you are.

Corruption in Corporate America - 797 Words

Corruption in Corporate America As said in every economics class, the reason every business goes into business is to make money. The same can be said in criminal cases involving businesses. In the majority of cases, executives and people highly ranked in the company tend to bend the numbers in the financial/accounting areas of the business or corporation. They do not do this for fun, but rather to make money. Something needs to be done before corporations really get out of hand. Thankfully, after the Enron Corporation scandal, the government has recently started to crack down on corporations and pay more attention to what they are doing. This is due to the extent of what Enron Corp did for so long. From approximately 1996 to 2001,†¦show more content†¦I feel that the people who commit these crimes are just overwhelmingly greedy and cannot control themselves. If they were able to build up the company, they obviously are intelligent minds and more than likely already have a si gnificant amount of money. Something needs to be done, especially when so many people are affected. Millions of people lost so much money and too many lost their life savings just because the people at the top of Enron were greedy. It seems as though the government is taking small steps in the right direction. However, I feel that more needs to be done especially because some of these companies are funding and supplying potential terrorists. That is just outrageous and shows the extent of what people will do to make money. This is difficult to control and monitor but more steps need to be made. Hopefully the politicians and others of the future will recognize this ever-growing problem and solve it for the companies toShow MoreRelatedCorporate America And The Corruption Within The Hip Hop Culture1625 Words   |  7 PagesCorporate America and the Corruption within the Hip-Hop Culture Being one of the more controversial lifestyles, the hip-hop culture has overcome many obstacles in the years to gain the respect it currently holds today. Indeed, there is still much controversy that lingers around the people within the movement, but â€Å"when untainted by outside influences and corporate vultures, hip-hop in its purest form is about empowerment, unity, culture, creativity, and hope† (Elkouby). The negative notions thatRead MoreScandal In Corporate America: An Ethical, Not A Legal, Problem921 Words   |  4 PagesAre businesses in corporate America making it harder for the American public to trust them with all the recent scandals going on? Corruptions are everywhere and especially in businesses, but are these legal or are they ethical problems corporate America has? Bruce Frohnen, Leo Clarke, and Jeffrey L. Seglin believe it may just be a little bit of both. Frohnen and Clarke represent their belief that the scandals in corporate America are ethical proble ms. On the other hand, Jeffrey L. Seglin arguesRead MoreThe Jungle by Upton Sinclair The story â€Å"The Jungle† by Upton Sinclair is somewhat of a declaration900 Words   |  4 Pagesmatters of sociopolitical issues, capitalism, political corruption, and the depravedness of corporate personnel, corporatism, and industrialism; it inspires progressivism in its strong and thought-provoking messages and lives by its title. The story is about a recently married Lithuanian couple – Jurgis and Ona, and their ten other siblings who all come to America, as immigrants, in search of the â€Å"American Dream,† the advertisement by which America sells itself as the land of freedom and opportunityRead MoreThe Rise Of Corporate Capitalism1398 Words   |  6 Pages market, so they began to intervene in business affairs despite their original pledge not to. The government assisted a great deal in the rise of corporate capitalism (business economy run by corporations and monopolies such as the Standard Oil Company and the U.S. Steel Company) through its laissez-faire policies, railroad involvement, and corruption. T: The U.S. government assisted in the rise of corporations by its laissez-faire policies. R: Take, for instance, the wrong-doings of the railroadsRead MoreThe Gilded Age Of America1621 Words   |  7 PagesThroughout history, America was faced with many problems socially, economically, politically, and technologically. But America has also experienced many great successes in these areas as well. Some opportunities were seized, while others were wasted. We can learn from our past failures and successes and take what we have learned from them forward with us into the future, to help build and maintain a better America. The Gilded Age, during the late 1800’s, was a time in America where we experiencedRead MoreThe Rich And Large Corporations Get Richer967 Words   |  4 PagesIn Sander’s (2011) book, upon reviewing it, a few topics came up. Sanders speaks specifically on how in the United States there are a plethora of corporate greed and corruption. Like Sanders (2011) quotes in his book: The rich and large corporations get richer, the CEOs earn huge compensa tion packages, and when things get bad, don t worry; Uncle Sam and the American taxpayers are here to bail you out. But when you are in trouble, well, we just can t afford to help you, if you are in the workingRead MoreAmeric The People, For The Corporations1738 Words   |  7 PagesAmerica: By the People, For the Corporations I. Introduction Corporate money in politics has become an increasingly prominent issue in the political spectrum of the United States after the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision which lifted the cap on political contributions from corporations, thus increasing the influence companies have on the US electoral process (Shekar 71). This controversial court case brought the issue of non-voter influence on elected officials to the political stageRead MoreOccupy Wall Street Movement1039 Words   |  5 Pages Occupy Wall Street Movement Moral and Ethical Implications The Occupy Wall Street Movement that started in September 2011 in Liberty Square in the Finical District was movement organized by people to expose corruptions in cooperate America. The Occupy Wall Street Movement was known, as the peaceful protest due to it’s non-violent, non-aggressive nature and spread to over a one hundred and fifty cities cross the United Sates. Moral and ethical implications are the essentiallyRead MoreCorporate Social Responsibility And Csr1555 Words   |  7 PagesCSR Concept The following report has been prepared with a view to understand how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) works in the Brazilian market. CSR is quite a recent theme in the world, and even more in Brazil. There is not an exclusive concept accepted when it comes to the definition of CSR, (Araujo, 2006; Oliveira Claro; Pimentel Claro; Lucci, 2009). According to Passador (2002), the first CSR concept in Brazil (between businesses, society and the State) emerged with the publication of theRead MoreThe Influence Of The Industrial Revolution953 Words   |  4 Pagesbig business. The revolution shows us what can happen if you let greed struck corporate owners have influence and control over a country, because power and materialism corrupted their minds they began to create some of the greatest economic empires in the world. This lead to them underpaying their workers from the desires to become the most powerful men in America. One of the most successful men in America was Cornelius Vanderbilt, he started out as just another businessman. The only

Australians Taxation Pape v Commissioner

Question: Discuss about the Australians Taxation Pape v Commissioner. Answer: Introduction Pape versus Commissioner of Taxation was raised by Bryan Pape, a barrister and law lecturer. The plaintiff represented himself in court. Essentially, Pape challenged the statutory validity of the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No. 2) 2009. Particularly, he challenged the legislation with the view that the proposed bonus payments were essentially a gift. Thus the payments did not follow the stipulated taxation power of the countrys constitution. However, the commonwealth maintained that the law was sustained by a mix of the appropriations power as stipulated in section 81 of the constitution (Tax Bonus 2009), the trade of commerce, taxation and implied nationhood power Background of the Act The Commonwealth offered the Australian government a grant to initiate a stimulus program that would regulate the economy from falling into a period of recession during the worldwide economic crisis of 2008. Consequently, the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No 2) 2009 (Cth) was initiated (Tax Bonus Act 2009). According to the law, the official should pay the bonus to qualified individuals. However, the receiver must be an individual who has been a resident in the country for taxation purposes. In addition, the individual must have a tax liability. Typically, the eligible taxpayers are those who paid income tax during the 2007-2008 financial year, after considering the accessible tax credits. In addition, the taxpayers must have a taxable income of $100,000 or less (Tax Bonus 2009). Primarily, the total payment is dependent on the individuals earnings for that period. The Court Case The plaintiff, Pape, was eligible to obtain a payment of $250 as a bonus under the Act. However, he issued the court a writ for declarations that the disbursement of the bonus and the tax bonus Act were unconstitutional. For this reason, he believed that disbursements of the bonus were void and unlawful. In addition, Bryan Pape wanted an order to restrain the payments of the tax bonus payments to him (Pape v Commissioner 2009). The respondents to the case comprised of the commissioner of taxation and the Commonwealth. During the case, the South Australia, New South Wales, and Western Australias Attorney-Generals intervened. Remarkably, Mr. Pape represented himself. The hearing commenced as from March 30th to 1st April 2009 (Kate 2009). In the course of the writ, a special case was prepared. In that particular case, four questions were stated for the consideration of the court. Other Laws and Acts Relating to the Case Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act. Essentially, this Act instructs that the responsible official must offer a tax advantage to qualified individuals as specified in article 5 of the constitution. However, the payment is conditional to the fact the taxpayer must be an individual who resides Australia with an adjusted tax liability of more than zero but less than $100,000 (Pape v Commissioner 2009). The Executive Power of the Commonwealth. Primarily, these powers are conferred under section 61 of the constitution. According to the Act, the scope of this authority comprises of those powers granted to the institution by sanctions and statutes of the office. By and large, executive power exists to sustain policymaking activities suitable to the authority of the institution as a national body. It is worth noting that section 61 gives the executive the authority to provide instant fiscal stimulus to prevent economic crisis. Taxation Power. Predominantly, these powers are laid out in section 51 of the countrys constitution, where the powers of the Commonwealth are enumerated. Additionally, the constitution clearly outlines that the overall power of the Commonwealth to impose taxation must be carried out with respect to section 51 which confers enumerated powers subject to the law of the land. The Concept of Breach By and large, the writ was founded on the basis that most aspects of government spending are not allied to any form of Commonwealth legislative power. For this reason, the plaintiff believed that there was a breach of the constitution as regards to the taxation power, the implied nationhood power, and even the trade of commerce power (Bran Pape 2009). However, the high court judge believed that refuting the supremacy of the institution to finance this program as stated in section 81 of the Australian law would be the beginning of rendering the regime numb (Tax Bonus 2009). According to article 81, all money received and collected by the commonwealth should be transferred to a Consolidated Revenue Fund (Tax Bonus Act 2009). In turn, the consolidated fund is to be disbursed for accountabilities of the institution according to the form and conditional to the liabilities and charges created by the nations constitution. In the same way, Section 83 stipulates that no funds should be withdrawn from the treasury of the institution apart from those provisions made by the law. With respect to section 81 of the constitution, the institution argued that the law grants it the legislative power to make laws for appropriating money. In addition, it suggested that the parliament's authority to institute regulations for appropriating funds was unrestricted. In Contrast, Pape argued that the Appropriation Act gives no imminent authority to expend the available funds. Additionally, he portends that the Appropriation act is merely a constitutional requisite and a procedural regulation aimed at guaranteeing acquiescence with the fundamental principle of an accountable government (Dollery Grant 2010). For this reason, the policymakers must get approval from the regime before it can receive the appropriated money. In this regard, the Appropriation Act omits the exclusion that prohibits policymakers from withdrawing reserves from the appropriated fund. In addition, the Mr. Pape debated that the funds that were to be disbursed to eligible persons as a gratuity were not lawfully paid out from the Consolidated Revenue Fund, considering the provisions given under section 83. He also claimed that although there was a payment made by the law, it was not appropriated for the purpose of the nation. It is thus, worth pointing out that the plaintiff maintained a reasonable argument concerning the invalidity and validness of the provisions made by the government. Nonetheless, the high court affirmed that the appropriation and disbursements of the tax bonus were lawful and valid under the countrys constitution (Appleby McDonald 2011). Analysis of the Courts Decision Upon submission of the writ by Mr. Pape, the participants conceded on submitting four questions to the presiding court for resolution. This was made by means of a special case. The first order pertained to whether Mr. Pape had the right to pursue the relief indicated in his statement of claim and summons. Secondly, the questions tried to determine if the tax bonus was valid given that it was reinforced by various implied and express heads of statutory power under the nations constitution (Bryan Pape 2009). The third question sought to determine if the imbursement of the bonus that the Mr. Pape was eligible for according to the law was in accordance with a lawful appropriation under the Australian constitution. Finally, the last order wanted to determine the party that would pay the expenses of the case at hand (Bryan Pape 2009). With regards to the first question, the Commonwealth agreed that the plaintiff had the standing to contend that the money appropriated to him was improper. Conversely, they insisted that he lacked the adequate special interest to dispute the far-reaching matter that the Act was illegal in disbursing payments to other individuals (Williams 2009). For this reason, all court members rejected the proposal. As such, the courts realization that the payment to the plaintiff was void since the Act was void would be referred to in any following cases regarding the lawfulness of the rule. Thus, all judges decided that the plaintiff had the right to pursue a statement of invalidity (High Court Reasons 2009). On question two, a majority of the court members maintained the view that the Act was a legal law in the country. In their argument, they referred to section 51 as being a guiding tool for the application of the Commonwealth Governments policymaking power with respect to section 61 (High Court Reasons 2009). As for the third order, the plaintiff portended that the funds disbursed to the countrys residents in accordance with the law had not been made from the required fund as per the law. In addition, he reasoned that even the appropriation was made as per the Act, it was not a disbursement for the benefit of the Commonwealth. Besides, section 81 explicitly directs that all moneys and revenues collected or raised by the Commonwealth Government are to be put into one consolidated revenue fund (High Court Reasons 2009). These funds are to be made for the benefit of the institution subject to liabilities and controls laid out in the constitution (Eskerie 2012). Regardless of the plaintiffs justifications, the court maintained that the appropriation of the tax bonus was made as directed by the law. They justified their argument with respect to article 3 which has the consequence of transforming the payment rule into a taxation rule (Bryan Pape 2009). In this regard, the Act amplified the sum of funds to be cashed out from the Consolidated Revenue Fund under the prevailing stipulations. By and large, this was adequate to satisfy the demands indicated in article 81 of the countrys constitution. Even so, the court maintained that sections 81 and 83 did not authorize any form of spending, but they necessitate that such expenditures by the government be sanctioned by the Australian parliament (Appleby McDonald 2011). To cater for the last question, it was agreed that there was no order for costs related to the special hearing. Thus, there were no charges conferred to either party in the case. Owing to the factors mentioned above, the court ruled that the Act was a binding rule in the country. As such, the Act authenticates the appropriation of the stipulated funds or adjusted tax liability to eligible taxpayers within the country. It is also crucial to note that even though the judges unanimously agreed in favor of the tax bonus, they rejected the institutions point of view pertaining to various factors (Blackshield Williams 2009). By a majority, the judges failed to agree on the institution's principal argument that the legislature may sanction a regulation necessitating a payment and controlling the factors that are to be satisfied before they are made. In addition, they disputed the bodys argument that the executive has implied and express power to disburse any money lawfully appropriated. The judges also believed that the Commonwealth misinterpreted section 81 of the constitution (Blackshield Williams 2009). Notably, they disputed the idea that article 81 is an approval to the legislature of the mandate to allocate the appropriated money for any use it deems suitable (McLeod 2009). For this reason, it is trivial to discern that the unanimous decision by the high court was restricted by the fact that rendering Mr. Papes tax bonus invalid would render the entire tax Bonus Act invalid by implication. Specifically, such a decision would have been the beginning of the stultification of the power of the government (Hogg Lawson 2009). The judges were merely concerned with the idea that granting Mr. Papes wishes would bear significant implications for future government programs of the same caliber. Such a ruling would be used as a precedent in preceding cases, rendering the governments powers numb. Besides, the final decision made by the judges neglects the fact that the Commonwealth lost in all the primary submissions. In this regard, the ruling was made despite the fact that the executive could not justify its power to make impugned expenditure (Kerr 2009). References Appleby, J. McDonald, S 2011, The Ramifications of Pape v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation for the Spending Power and Legislative Powers of the Commonwealth, SSRN, retrieved 13 January 2017, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1864245 Australian Government Solicitor, 2009, High Court reasons for the Pape decision on the Tax Bonus Act, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www.ags.gov.au/publications/express-law/el101.pdf Blackshield, T, Williams, G, 2009, Australian Constitutional Law and Theory, the Federation press. Eskerie, K 2012, Pape, Williams and the rules of standing, Sparke Helmore, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www.sparke.com.au/insights/pape-williams-and-the-rules-of-standing/ Federal Register of Legislation, 2009, Tax Bonus for Working Australians bill (No. 2) 2009 Tax bonus for working Australians (consequential amendments) bill (No. 2) 2009, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2009B00019/Explanatory%20Memorandum/Text Grant, B, Dollery, B, Constitutionalism, Federalism and Reform? Pape v Commissioner of Taxation Anor- A conversation with Bryan Pape Public policy, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 2-9. Hannon, K 2009, Lawyer wants federal spending audited, the Age, retrieved 13 January 2017, https://www.theage.com.au//breaking-news-national/lawyer-wants-federal-spending-audited-20090708-dd40.html High Court of Australia, Bryan Reginald Pape V the Commissioner of Taxation Of The Commonwealth of Australia Anor [2009] HCA 23, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2009/hca23-2009-07-07.pdf Hogg, M, Lawson, C 2011, The watershed for Commonwealth appropriation and spending after Pape and Williams?, Griffith University, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/62724/95823_1.pdf;sequence=1 Kerr, D, 2009, Pape v Commissioner of Taxation: Fresh Fields for Federalism, Public Lecture, Qut Faculty of Law, 11November 2009. Pp. 2-12, November 11 2009. McLeod, A 2009, The Executive and Financial Powers of the Commonwealth: Pape v Commissioner of Taxation, Sydney University, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_32/slr32_1/McLeod.pdf News.com, 2009, Kevin Rudd's bonus in Bryan Pape High Court challenge, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www.news.com.au/finance/money/high-court-to-rule-on-900-cash-bonus/news-story/3c706f48271c26056fb6b81c69689b50 Pape v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] HCA 23 Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No. 2) 2009 (Cth). Williams, G 2009, Bryan Pape and his legacy to the law, retrieved 15 January 2017, https://www.tpdlaw.com.au/assets/articles/Bryan_Pape_and_his_Legacy_to_the_Law.pdf

The Grapes Of Wrath Essays (892 words) - U.S. Route 66, Dust Bowl

The Grapes of Wrath John Steinbeck's novel, The Grapes of Wrath has left much specifically untold about the authors true intentions on this book. His epic chronicle has been described as being "Written with passionate conviction" (Dorothy Parker). This passionate conviction has led John Steinbeck into mastering bold dramatization. His skills at the art of dramatization in literature was not solely used in The Grapes of Wrath, but also used in another of his twisted and possibly controversial works called Of Mice and Men. One of John Steinbeck's main and possibly most obvious themes, is the hostility and frequent hatred between the migrant workers and the already socially and financially established Californians. There are many examples in the book that show not only that Steinbeck thought that it was an issue to be concerned with, but also it showed his thoughts and feelings towards the subject. Three examples of this theme are shown during encounters with other people that have already been there, in the corollary chap Along the way to California the Joad's encountered other people that had already been to California and were now returning. These people, like the ragged man with the sunburned face from the road-side camp described on page 242. He had had children that died because wages were too low and work was too scarce to afford food for his children and wife. His story was one of pain and despair, also his story showed the cruelty and inhumane treatment which the California land owners displayed towards the migrant workers. This grim story of the broken man didn't discourage the Joad's from parting from the set course. Later on inside the Californian border the Joads stop by a river. Tom and his Father find a spot to go swimming where they are promptly joined on page 263 by two men, a man and his son, who asked if they may also partake in swimming with Tom and his Father. The men start talking and it turns out that the other two men have just come from California. They tell a story not extremely unlike the other story which the man at the road-side camp described. Their story describes the conditions as very uncomfortable. Subsequently the Joads paid no head to this warning either. Hence, they traveled on, only to meet up with (on page 274) a very dispassionate police officer. This gave the Joads a first hand sip of the general mood that Californians had for these migrant workers. The policeman treated the migrants with little or no respect, seemed to just as soon see them drop off the face of the earth than see them come into California. The Corollary chapter Nineteen deals with the history of California. How it was settled by the feverish Americans. Through these descriptions we can start to understand the Californians view on why they dislike the migrant workers with such conviction. The chapter describes the initial owners of the land, the Mexicans, as being "weak and fed". This description would suggest that the Mexican's were well fed and content to live freely on the land with little desire to need more. Thus they were in little position to try and stop the onslaught of American's who wanted the land much more than the Mexicans did, and were too weak to stop them from doing so. This lead to the turning over of the land to the American's in the California region. This same land was kept by the same families and worked with much success. So much success that they needed to work only part of it to stay leisurably comfortable, financially. Therefore the burning desire for the land diminished. This is where the migrant workers come in. The Californians view of the workers are very much the same as the Mexican's must have thought of the Californians when there land was taken over. Consequently the Californians, being afraid that history might repeat itself and the workers may take over the land, the Californians tried to discourage the growth in population of migrant workers as much as possible. Any way that they could, legal or not. The killing of Jim Casy is an example of the cruel behavior of the Californians. They