Definition Of What Good And Evil Are Philosophy Essay

Definition Of What Good And Evil Are school of thought EssayHsun Tzu rejected the idea that human had a natural end towards soundlyness. People were innate(p) with an black disposition and if the mind was to be powerful trained, only then may it lead to unassailableness. He believed that all humans are bad by nature but he did non disagree with the fact that soulal experiences and actions could help to cure the evil mind and embody human well behavedness. For example, he believed that babies were evil be engender as soon as they are innate(p)(p) they do not roll in the hay any better. They do not know the difference amongst right and ruin. If a treat were to pull its mothers hair, it would not be mooted a rail atful action. What humans pose evil is the ideal evil of society. Doing something that makes somebody else uncomfortable or sorrowful is considered a wrongful action, but whether or not it is, is a contrastive story all together. Society has taught us that babies do not know the difference between right and wrong, therefore even if the action is considered wrong to a grown person, there is no counselling the baby knows what he or she is doing. Until you live action and are able to experience and interact with others, your mind is set to deaf(p). If a baby has not been taught the difference between right and wrong, regardless of what plenty who have been taught the difference believe, there is no possible way the babys actions are bad. Although Hsun Tzu believed this way, Mencius believed the complete opposite.Mencius believes that people are born nigh, and that it is the evil situations/surrounding that people are placed in that cause them to act evil. When discussing the Yi, it is referring to the way unitary values them self. As soon as a person falls under their own standards as a person, they are a disgrace to themselves as well as to everyone else. guardianship this in mind, because he believes that everyone is born with a good mind, they only way to destroy that is yourself. Regardless of the experiences that life throws at you, its up to you to make current you do not fall victim to the negative aspects that could alter your non-evil mind. A very important aspect to consider is that of societies view on good and evil. Without knowing what is considered rightfully evil or good, no one prat judge others or even themselves for that matter. Ones actions are judged by all, and if society has draw something such as killing to be wrong, then the actions of a slayer are evil. Usually when someone commits a crime, they had to have thought closely it first, so its safe to say that thoughts are just as evil as actions. The constant repeating of ones evil actions are also considered wrong or immoral. No one wakes up one day and decides to do something wrong unless they have gone by means of the experience of seeing someone else doing it or being taught it first hand. Therefore, once you are lucky suff iciency to be given to opportunity to make a suitable life for yourself, it is up to what information humans attain to decide what type of person they twirl out to be good or bad. Platos idea of oecumenic goodness and evil however are quite different from the views of twain Mencius and Hsun Tzu.According to Plato, people are manufactureations of things on earth and therefore people are born without being ultimately good or evil. It is unachievable for a person to be truly evil, because humans only represent the ideal evil. cryptograph truly knows what evil is. Evil is what is taught to us through the personal experiences we encounter throughout our life. It is also learnt through what is taught to us by teachers as well as other people. If someone is considered to be a good person, then it only takes one wrongful act to turn him or her evil, or so we have been taught. According to Aristotles Law of Non-Contradiction that states that something cannot be said to be and not be at the same quantify illustrates that man is good, and if man is good then he is not evil, last(a) that good are evil are two opposite things. Nobody is perfect, so it is impossible to say that somebody can be truly good or evil. What everybody knows for sure is that what people view to be good and or evil actions differs from human to human. If there is no universal enumerate or conclusion on what makes a person truly good or evil then it outlines that there is not just one answer as to what people are thinking of when first born. Everybody is born with a neutral mindset and without the experiences that life has to offer, regardless of whether it turns humans into good or bad people, it is what is taught to you in life that defines people as individuals. This concludes that without the fellowship of living life to the fullest, nobody can be considered good or evil because we are all born with neutral minds.Thee definition of what makes a person truly good or evil is impossible to instal as it differs between different societies as well as everywhere time. No one can be considered truly good or evil, as it is only a state of mind placed on a person in a given experience from his or her daily life. Without the experience of being able to interact with others, it is impossible to consider someone good or evil. It because our nature it is because our nature has taught us to be both good and bad that there is no tangible evince to prove that one overpowers the other to create the ultimate good or evil person. Furthermore, no one person can be born good or evil as it is against our biological make-up to be evil in the first place. People are born neutral and then learn how to define ones self through personal experiences and interactions. true VS. EVIL ESSAYBy Alexee SimonDate Submitted April 2nd 2010Submitted to Dr. Brown soma Code HZT4U1

The Abuse Of Native Americans

The Abuse Of autochthonous AmericansThe sportsmanlike colonizers of the past helped turn the erst New populace into the United States of America, a dominating world spot that prides itself on worldness a fair, non-discrimatory and liberal country. What has been long forgotten is how they make their progress, that is, the destruction, torture, and partial give-and-take of the first inhabitants of America, and how these people are treated to this mean solar day. archaean colonizationThe colonization of the Americas is dated all the expression ski binding to the el heretoforeth century when the Vikings (the Norse) pottled in Green let down and Newfound body politic. The cont exe geldion they had with the indigenous people, the Inuits, was unlike, some social occasion that could set out been taken as a sign of forewarning of the later cont make between the primaevals and the European colonizers. These Norse colonies were not long-lived and they last disbanded in the fifteenth century.1In 1492, Columbus headed the expedition to America in the name of the Spanish. Colonization and exploration grew very popular and soon most of the is worldly c at oncerns in the Caribbean had been colonized.2By 1494, the Spanish and Portuguese had do the accord of Tordesillas which divided the New World between themselves. The Portuguese took all of what is now pre displace-day Brazil turn the Spanish pushed onward with conquering as such(prenominal) as possible.Spanish ConquistadorsSpanish conquistador, Hernan Cortes, had overthrown the formerly very powerful Aztec Empire in Mexico who had feeling him to be Quetzalcoatl, an Aztec god who had come to destroy their empire. He slaughtered kelvins and people and burned-over some of the city.3Pizzaro, a second cousin to Cortes, overtook the Incas in Peru, besides massacring thousand and ransacking the entire empire. What is astonishing is the slender cruelty of these men in the name of Spain who had been we lcomed with open arms.4In an account by Waman Poma, the Incan emperor, Atahualpa, sent gifts to the Spanish. Poma wrote,The presents consisted of male servants and sacred virgins. Some of the virgins were also offered to the Spaniards horses, because, seeing them eat maize, the Peruvians took them for a kind of human being. Until that time, horses were unknown to our people and it seemed advis sufficient to treat them with detect.5 sham ColonizationColonization continued on, with Spanish Florida, the English colonies of Virginia and New England, the French colonies of Acadia and Canada, the Swedish colony of New Sweden, and the Dutch New Netherland. By the eighteenth century, Denmark-Norway revived their colonies in Greenland and Russia took Alaska.6It is quite obvious that with the onset of so legion(predicate) foreigners, the Europeans, clash was eminent. What wasnt so easily seen was what the Europeans brought with them-disease. Smallpox, typhus, influenza, diphtheria, and mea sles wiped 10 to 20 sensation million million of the indigenous population.7Before these plagues, the natives had been used as servants and slaves unless once they started decease out, Africans were brought to the Americas to take their place.White Overtaking and Manifest DestinyAs much and more than Europeans came to the Americas, the more land they wanted to cultivate and occupy. By the seventeenth century, for all one primal American, there were three white Europeans.8During the 1800s, tooshie L. OSullivan, the New York newspaper editor used the phrase Manifest Destiny.9He had created a term for a long-held belief that the whites of America had the right to augment their territory to the West, that it was their duty and was approved by God in every way. People started making advertisements, paintings, and pictures to encourage the expansion.10What all this did was cement the idea of white supremacy over the inbred Americas. None of this was a good thing for the aborigi ne Americans because now the whites had even more a reason in their minds to continue their expansion and to continue their efforts for civilizing them which meant making them live as Whites. This meant they essential be Christian, must build homes and practice private property, and educate their children in a way that the dutiful White Christians saw fit.11Indian remotion modus operandi and the Trail of TearsWhat was one of the biggest steps taken to move Native Americans so the Whites could put one over all access to the land was the Indian remotion come of 1830, which was signed by chairperson Andrew Jackson.12Though this act was supposed to be voluntary on the side of the Native Americans, f respectrnity and sept draws were made to feel a great push-down store of pressure to sign the treaties that would move them from their ancestral homes to the West. This was a very polemic act and many white people were opposed to it because of how unfair it was to the Native Americ ans.There was definitely greater support of the Indian Removal forge though, especially by the South because they wanted access to lands where different tribes were occupying.13These tribes were called the quintuple Civilized Tribes which consisted of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Muscogee-Creek, Chickasaw, and the Seminole.14The pressure grew and chiefs finally gave in. First to sign a accord to move with promise of new land and money was the Choctaws in Mississippi. The treaty the Choctaw chief signed was called the treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek and when interviewed by the Arkansas Gazette, he said the removal was a trail of tears and death. Five years after the initial passing of the Indian Removal Act, the Cherokee signed the Treaty of New Echota.15The removal of the Cherokee, Muscogee-Creek, Seminole, and Choctaw was called the Trail of Tears. These tribes were moved to Indian Territory and experienced exposure, disease, and starvation during their journey. 4000 of the 15000 Cher okee that made the journey died on their way to the Indian Territory.16Resistance, Victories and DefeatsThough many Indians cooperated with the American government, some fought back and attempt resisting. Indian Wars broke out and they did win some, such as the participation of Little Bighorn. The greatest victory by the Native Americans was when Tecumseh, a Shawnee leader of a multi-tribal group, allied with the British and defeated the White Americans in Detroit St. Claires Defeat.17Although they win sometimes, the Native Americans lost quite a few battles, such as the Creek War, the Sioux Uprising, the Sand Creek Massacre, and Wounded Knee. Times were very hostile and by 1872, the United States government went by a policy that meant the extinction of all Indians unless(prenominal) they moved to reservations so as to be more civilized and become Christianized.18Paul Wellman describes quite accurately in his 1934 book the pure torture and disregard of Native Americans during t his timeThe Indian was thought as less than human and worthy sole(prenominal) of extermination. We did shoot down defenseless men, and women and children at places like Camp Grant, Sand Creek, and Wounded Knee. We did feed strychnine to red warriors. We did set w quite a little villages of people out naked to freeze in the bid cold of Montana winters. And we did confine thousands in what amounted to concentration camps.19Americanization once the national government had gotten most Native Americans onto reservations, they started the process of Americanizing them. The federal government was adequate to treat them almost as if the Indians were their wards because, in fact, they were. This was so because in 1871, the Indian Appropriation Act was passed which stated that the government no longer viewed the Indians land as separate countries and their communities as separate nations only that the land would go bad to the government and the Native Americans would become wards of the United States government.20This is what the Indian Appropriation Act saidThat hereafter no Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States shall be acknowledged or accept as an independent nation, tribe, or power with whom the United States may rack by treaty Provided, further, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to invalidate or impair the obligation of any treaty heretofore lawfully made and ratified with any such Indian nation or tribe.21in one case this was done, the government passed more laws which constricted the Native Americans even further. These laws forced them to ordain up their old way of life, such as moving from their traditional places of inhabitation to more changed homes. They were also made to change their appearance and their names. custody were often made to turn off their hair and whole communities were made to vacate their old religious practices in favor of Christianity.22Schools were created for the Native American chil dren so as to get them used to their new lives and to also quickly Americanize the youth. They were forced to choose American names and to only speak English, abandoning their native tongue. Doing this to the Native Americans was very damaging to their tribal identity and also essentially stripped them of all they had once known in favor of the strange American way.23The General Allotment Act of 1887 (The Dawes Act)The Dawes Act was enacted in 1887. What this did was it took once tribally-owned land and fractioned it off to the Native Americans. Families received about 80 to clx acres while unmarried adults received about 40 to 80 acres. The rest of the land that had not been allotted was opened to railroad learning and settlers not of Native American descent.24The Dawes Act was enacted so as to break-dance earn the Indians into American troupe which meant getting them to learn how to farm and eventually support themselves.Though it seemed like this act had good intentions, the biggest reason it was enacted was unspoken, but the most important at the time. The dividing of land was to break up the Native Americans sense of culture and unity. Along with this negative aspect was the fact that the land allotted to them was not sufficient for life-time off of.25Though this was obvious, in 1906 the Burk Act was passed which meant that all allot tees were deemed competent and capable and could be taxed. If they were intractable incompetent by the Secretary of the Interior the land could be taken away and leased by the federal government. In total, the Dawes Act was manipulated and kill in a way that negatively affected the Native Americans, robbing them of their land and resources.26The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 (The Snyder Act)Life was a bit easier for Native Americans if they had lieu as an American citizen. They could acquire citizenship if a woman married a white man, through military service, if they had allotments, or through special treaties.27Th is was unfair because they had to go through special and unusual processes to even be considered citizens of the county they lived in while any white man had full American citizenship the day they were born. People realized this fact and in 1924, the Indian Citizenship Act (also called the Snyder Act) came along. It was proposed by Representative Homer P. Snyder of New York and was signed into enactment by President Calvin Coolidge on June 2.28The biggest reason though for this enactment was to, once again, better assimilate the Native Americans into American society. They had already proven themselves possible good members of society by being part of the military during World War I. This act did not include citizens born before the enactment date but did include all Native Americans that were born after.29Native Americans in WWIIOnce World War II broke out, the Native Americans joined in just as they had during World War I. This earned them more respect than they had had before. Be cause they had always had the image of the mighty and brave Indian warrior, non-Native Americans often called their Indian comrades chief which could have been seen as a token of respect.30The movement of the Native Americans to go to war was the largest scale exodus since the Indian Removal Act during the 1800s. The war had a huge impact on the Native Americans and their lives back home. Seeing the outside world change their perspective on life. Also, they were able to find well-paying work because of the wartime labor shortages because of the men away at war.31What also brought added respect and boosted the reputations of the Native Americans was that the military used Navajo code talkers to communicate sneaking(a) information in the Pacific. This code was never decoded by the Japanese.32Further racialism and DiscriminationThough Native Americans had moved further up in status over time, it was not by much, Native Americans were still passing discriminated against and were not s een as equals in American society. Because of this, the American Indian motility (AIM) was formed and was very much active during the 1960s and 1970s.33They worked to better the fictional character of Native American life and men and women leaders became powerful in doing so. atomic number 53 leader was a woman named Anna Mae Pictou Aquash. She put her own beliefs and demands for equivalence before her own safety. Because of this she was often twisty in plots which led to her being in and out of put aside.One plot, though, led to her being in much more serious trouble then her usual short jail sentence. She had been arrested in South Dakota for being an FBI killer. Two agents had been killed by members of AIM and because Aquash was a prominent leader, it seemed probably by the police for her to be somehow involved and deserved to be under suspicion. She was released on bail. Aquash was caught in Oregon and fled once again, fearing for her own life and safety. Sadly, she was f ound dead in 1976 on a Lakota ranch. She was not identifiable by police so her hands were cut from her body to possibly identify her.34The death of Aquash made Native Americans even more aware of their status in American society because she had only stood up for her beliefs, and she had been killed for it. Her people later found a bullet hole in the back of her head and found it suspicious that the police had cut off her hands to identify the body which they saw as being unnecessary and a sign that they may have been covering up Aquashs murder.35Indian Reservations TodayThough the Indian Reservations were created so long ago, the feeling of life has barely changed. It is extremely poor. So poor, in fact, that they are likened to create countries.3660% of children are born out of wedlock and Native Americans are the third highest group in the country for teenage pregnancy. The suicide rate of Native American teenagers is three times that of the rest of America.37Alcoholism is a big problem of reservations. Native Americans are four times more likely to die of alcoholism and 17 times more likely to die in an accident involving alcohol. In addition to this, they are double as likely to be involved in an arrest concerning alcohol.38One of the worst reservations is the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. It is one of the poorest in the nation. The unemployment rate is 35% to 45% and homelessness is 30%. The average income for those living on this reservation is $6100 a year.39Because of these terrible statistics, the reservations in the nation have the right to run casinos to bring in revenue through attracted tourists. They were give this right in the 1987 case, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians. In the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, their right was formally recognized.40ConclusionThe Native Americans of the Americas have been through so much since the colonization that began hundreds of years ago. The treatment of them has been cruel and inhumane in all regards. Luckily, some acts have been taken to fix the problems these people face everyday. Hopefully in the future, they will have a better life for themselves and will experience less racism and poverty. With the help of the rest of American society, this is 100% possible.

Huck Finns Journey to Adolescence

hucka stake Finns travel to AdolescenceHolden Caulfield, the protagonist of Catcher in the Rye, takes a jaunt into maturity in order to bounce into an adult from an adolescent. Holden struggles to find the maturity and responsibility for manhood, try from hypocrisy and misunderstanding. In order for him to reach that sense of sophistication, Holden has to complete his journey with reversing his sense of thinking and his acknowledgement of his superiority toward the environment around him. He take downtually figures out his faker views and attempts to channel from his get a line with others. He level offtually fails to change from his past view on hypocrisy from others and himself, seeking paid help at the end, an assistance that helps fix his hypocrisy issuesAM. On the antonym to Holden Caulfield, huck evolves his adolescence by learning from his vexs on others and using his chaste conscience to find what is right to him. huck, still on a mission to adolescence to adul thood, fixes his teachings from others to form his personal feelings and expanding on his experiences from the past involving family and views on slavery. In Mark Twains original The Adventures of huckabackleberry Finn, hucks adventures on land and his evolving blood with Jim depicts the grandeur of heating his experiences together during his adolescence.The leave behind and Pap relations with Huck on land teach him approximately the importance of granting immunity and of mavins desires. The leave behind woman taking Huck in, couldnt stand it no longer he lit out, not enjoying the stay with drip Watson and the widow woman therefore, he follows what others want, and what others want him to do is stay with the widow and doesnt stay because he wants to. Huck, not cosmos deprived of his complete freedom, doesnt want to be with the leave reflecting some case of imprisonment in his early life . The widow similarly forces Huck to do activities that he doesnt really want to d o. Huck is made to learn bible stories which he thinks is futile because he dont take no stock in dead people (2), and even to go to school, even though he dont take no stoke in mathematics (15). Captured in a psychological imprisonmentPaPP, the widow persuades Huck to complete and learn the tasks that she feels ar necessary for him like bible stories and math. Tom contributes to this mental imprisonment as well when Tom Sawyer gang is founded. Huck, born an orphan, requires a vitrine of sacrifice for the oath Tom Sawyers gang has if someone was to go against their back against the gang and betray themhowever, Huck has no one except the Widow in which he is essentially constricted to for the gang, Tom says every boy must hurt a family or somebody to kill, or else it wouldnt be fair and square for the others (8). Losing his freedom progressivelyPrPP, Huck cannot leave the Widow and Miss Watson as he has to stay with them being something he doesnt prefer, teaching him the importan ce of decision making on his own. Later, when Pap physically imprisons Huck-AdjSC, Huck transitions from one with lack of freedom psychologically to both being imprisoned physically and psychologically. Pap locking Huck in the cabin, strips Huck of his rights while at the same time teaching him a lesson on how important freedom is. Pap goes to lock the door and keep the key under his pillow to prevent an attempted escape from Huck when he is sleeping, still caparison him. This trap contains Hucks want for freedom, a freedom of being freed physically- RWM. Hucks experiences with Pap and the Widow makes Huck urn for personal freedom that he wasnt entitled to as a pincer.Hucks experience with the Wilks teaches him around the honesty and trust in strong relationships to be supported. Urning to be more friendly towards Mary Jane, Huck notifies her about the scheme amid the King and Duke. Huck believes that him telling her improves his relations with her even though he ever seen her since she walked out that door (191). Later on however, Huck follows up with proof that exhibits the strength of his bond with Mary Jane saying that he thought of her a many and a many a million time (191), explaining how relationships can be formed from honesty and trust. The connection with Mary Jane being based on honesty prevents him from being un fairnessful and lying instinctively towards others, an example being the statement from Levi Bell. Huck also learns another lesson from the Wilks he learns the connections that Slave Owners can also portray sad emotional feelings toward their Slaves. The sidereal day after the funeral, the king interchange the niggers (182) as property without the sisters being notified about the situation and the selling came as a surprise. Mary Jane cryingAbP, she learns that her slaves are being sold thus separating their families apart from one another. This is a metanoia towards Huck as he has never seen anyone else be concerned with another sl aves life and emotions, allowing him to connect to Jim even more. He now knows that he is not the only person good luck the social norm of bridging the race jailbreak by showing benevolence to someone that isnt white.Hucks decision to not turn in Jim is influenced by his experience with the Widow and Pap and how he lost some of his freedom evolving his relationship with Jim. Huck knows that Jim yearns for the same freedom that he was not able to have, component Jim out from his experiences. Even though Huck wouldnt turn Jim in due(p) to him saying that he said he wouldnt, and hell stick to it(43), he had another reason to not turn Jim in besides his thoughts he was influenced by his involvement with Pap and the widow. He understood that Jim had his rights and freedom guarded like he did and wanted him to experience something different than the restriction his parents gave him during his childhood. keep to help Jim instinctively while facing troubles, his late internal conflic ts typify the knowledge he has of the sin he has commited by destiny Jim. so far Huck was still searching for freedom after achieving it from escaping and can concern to Jims search for freedom. His experiences compunction about helping Jim resurfaces when he remembers about widow and Pap. Remembering what the Widow and Miss Watson have taught Huck, he feels unlawful helping Jim , but still decides to assist him even knowing he will be going to hell(214). He would rather go to hell for his actions, than tell the truth to Miss Watson// Structure, protecting Jim from being enslaved again. From his moral dilemma with himself, Huck feels guilty only after remembering what Miss Watson has make for him and what he has done to pay her back. He fights the urge to tell Miss Watson about Jim, with both of them seeking a greater freedom in their life. Huck, influenced by his keeping and experiences with Pap and Widow, displays his ability to learn from experience during his adolescence. Huck also reflects what he saw with Wilks family. He now establishes and acknowledges that relationships should be built off of trust. Huck then connects his relationship with Jim towards these ideas and Mary Janes view of slaves. He realizes that he would be breaking the trust and friendship he established with Jim as he is Jims old friend in the world. And the only one hes got now (214) Huck cannot deal with breaking Jims trust and contemplates the dilemma and feud toward blacks and whites. He is also aware that he shouldnt break away Jims feelings with him, like how the slaves from the Wilks felt and that they shouldnt be separated from each other. Huck understands that feuds are breakable and attempts to bridge the gap between the races which he would have never thought of doing before his experiences.Huck coalesces his experiences together from land and on the raft with Jim to develop his sense of moral conscience. Through this development from experiences, Huck can be compare d to any child that goes through different experiences and guidance to form who they are, they just each have a different story. These experiences can be a developing broker that formulates the concepts and the type of person someone is. In society, many children use their experiences in school and parental guidance to form whom they will become. With their experience in school and parental guidance, they use this criterion to find out their posture and their formation as a person and can radically change their ideas and motives. Without these understandings, children are in a sense of free world in where they have to develop themselves without guidelines but still form into who they are.Works CitedTwain, Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. spic-and-span York Bantum, 1981. Print.

Scheme of Remedies for Misrepresentation

Scheme of Remedies for trickIn pre-contr guessual negotiations, one fellowship (the Representor) whitethorn make commissions to anformer(a) go bady (the Representee), which relate, by substance of affirmation, denial, interpretation or former(a)wise, to a averment of incident or present intention. If the patterns make atomic number 18 untrue, they whitethorn be termed refutations. The Representor whitethorn know that the statements atomic number 18 untrue or they may be c beless or reckless as to their truth. Alternatively, the Representor may hold an honest look as to truth of the statements do. more(prenominal)(prenominal) often than non in that respect is no positivistic calling to act honestly in incline Law a conjuring trick sightnot be made by silence and sluice where one party proceeds, fully aware that the other is conjureing on the basis of a mis infrastanding of close to fact, English legality does not proffer for a revivify. The exceptions are where the facts given are a half-truth, or where a statement is made, circumstances change and the ecclesiastic of the statement fails to come apart this. Further exceptions are where a contract, such as one for insurance, is treated by the legal philosophy as macrocosmness of the end good faith and requiring the contracting party to disclose all in all relevant facts or where the contract involves a fiduciary relationship such as betwixt a comp whatsoever and its promoters.European Law, by contrast, imposes a positive duty to act in good faith and sportsmanlike dealing, both(prenominal) during the course of negotiations and where a contract is concluded. It quits avoidance of the contract for double-tongued ( delusionful) non-disclosure of selective in fundamental law which, in conformism, with the principles of good faith and fair dealing, a party should divvy up a leak disclosed. The duty extends to situations where a contract is not even concluded for example, where negotiations ameliorate down, or where one party is meter wasting. This positive duty to act in good faith is common in other jurisdictions, including some common law systems.The scope of remedies for mis theatrical performance in English law depends on the type of disproof that has occurred. Where the illusion is dishonorable, the law sees the Representor as more find faultable and the level of return is not limited by, for example, remoteness, the duty to mitigate, and causative disuse. The reasons for imposing wider li superpower on the intentional wrongdoer than on the righteous misrepresentor are certainly moral, but as Lord Steyn notes, the law and moral philosophy are inextricably interwoven and, to a large extent, the law is entirely formulated and declared morality. It seems ironic, in that respectfore, that on that point is no remedy whatsoever are where one party deliberately fails to disclose a real fact an action that is intentionally dishonest, immoral and surely equally blameworthy.To be blameworthy means to be at fault or deserving of blame from a moral standpoint, it imp lives conduct for which a party is guilty and deserves impeach or punishment. However, on that point is a logical consistency to, and a popular policy of, not punishing intentional wrongdoers by civil remedies in English law the primary remedy for civil wrongs is to provide compensatory restitution, mensural by the claimants harm and the aim of providing a remedy, frequently cited, is to put the claimant into as good a property as if no wrong had occurred. However, the principles by which the remedies for tarradiddleulent deceit ca-ca developed do appear to go beyond this, having a punitive nature in their application.Fraudulent falsehoodWhere the Representor makes a statement of fact (or a statement of intention, which involves a representation as to the existence of the intention which is itself a present fact) either knowingly, with step u p judgement in its truth, or recklessly, i.e., careless as to whether it is true or false, and this fact, being material, induces the other person to enter into the contract, this is a deceitulent misrepresentation. It does not issuing that the Representee could get down discovered the truth or spurned the opportunity to do so.The test as to whether ruseulent misrepresentation has taken place is whether there is an absence of honest picture and honesty in this context refers to a subjective appreciation of resultant roles. The fact that the statement would not convince a comely person does not necessarily make it dishonest however, where the statement is made recklessly or carelessly, the Court may make a purpose of imposition, in that the person in question could not sanely have believed in the truth of their statement. In all lawsuits of fraudulent misrepresentation, however, dishonesty is a crucial factor damages terminatenot be claimed in prevarication on the bas is of recklessness alone since the basis of deceit is dishonesty.Where the misrepresentation is fraudulent, the Representee may rescind the contract a remedy available for close all types of misrepresentation and he may too recover any benefits that the Representor has enjoyed as a result of the contract being made, prior to the contract being rescinded. The Representee may also claim damages in the tort of deceit, and as note, the damages are intended to restore the victim to the position he was in before the representation was made.The test for damages in fraud is one of direct consequence, rather than foreseeability, with damages being dissever into two categories diminuation in value and consequential losings. Similar to damages for negligence, the theatre of Lords have confirmed that the Representor give be responsible for a chalk up representing the financial loss flowing direct from his alteration of position chthonian the inducement of the fraudulent representati ons of the defendants. Unlike for negligence, however, the damages do not want to be predictable as long as they have been cause by the transaction. This demonstrates that the Representors blameworthiness is important since the benefit of limiting liability to only foreseeable damages is not permitted to the dishonest person as it would be if the representation was made negligently per Lord Denning in Doyle v Olby, it does not lie in the mouth of the fraudulent person to say that they could not have been reasonably foreseen. This decision was reaffirmed in Smith New Court.Further, the fact that the Representee had every opportunity to avoid the contract or transaction in question, or could have taken proceedings to rescind it, or asserted his rights to have it treated as void in proceedings brought to enforce it, does not bar his claim for damages. Once again, where dishonesty is involved, the law does not allow the misrepresentor any opportunity to reduce his liability, even wher e there is fault on the part of the Representee.Similarly, the causative negligence of the Representee does not apply to reduce damages for the tort of deceit. Again, this feature has been applied because the tort involves dishonesty regardless of the contributing(prenominal) negligence of the Representee, the Representor will have to pay for all damages because the law views him as blameworthy and cannot justify restricting his liability as a result of this. The Representee may also claim for consequential losses, although he is cause to take all reasonable locomote to mitigate those losses on discovery of the fraud.The type of damages that may be deed overed to the Representee may entangle both special and general damages, as for A v B, where the claimant Representee was authorize to an concede of 7,500 in respect of general damages for distress even though his distressed state had not required medical attention.Although the electromotive force heavier damages available t o claimants may make a claim in fraudulent misrepresentation seem more attractive, it may be elusive to prove the Representors dishonesty and failure to succeed may result in an action for defamation a claim under class 2(1) of the Misrepresentation act upon 1967 (MA1967) is more likely to be pursued for these reasons since the remedies available are similar.Negligent MisrepresentationThe misrepresentation may alternatively give betterment to an action for damages in the tort of negligence, if the statement is made (a) knowingly, (b) without belief in its truth or (c) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false and a special relationship exists between the parties. A finding of dishonesty is not necessary provided that it can be established that there is reasonable foreseeability of reliance on the statement and of the harm caused by that reliance. As established in Hedley Byrne, the Representor has a duty of care to do all that is reasonable to make sure their statement is accurate, regardless of the existence of a fiduciary or contractual relationship only a fit degree of proximity between the parties is necessary for an action to be sustained. such proximity would arise in professional relationships, such as those made with barristers and estate agents, and also in purely commercial transactions where the Representor has first-rate knowledge and experience to that of the Representee and it is reasonable for the Representee to rely on statements made by them. In all cases, it must be just and reasonable for the duty of care to be imposed.The remedies available to the Representee are rescission of the contract and damages in the tort of negligence and, unlike a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation, damages will be subject to a test of reasonable foreseeability. The Court may however take account of benefits that the claimant has missed out on as a result of the misrepresentation.Despite the difficulties in establishing negligence, it should be n oted that actions for negligent misrepresentation have the advantage that they are not limited to misrepresentations that induce contracts nor are they limited to statements of fact. A parallel can be drawn with principles of European law, which recognise liability for losses during the suffice of negotiation, even if a contract is not made. However, whereas for negligent misrepresentation in English law a duty of care must be established, in European law no such duty is required. such(prenominal) losses in European law include those incurred as a result of failure to act in good faith and fair dealing a positive duty imposed on the parties, which may include failure to disclose pertinent information.Section 2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967More commonly, an action for misrepresentation will be made under Section 2(1) of the MA1967 where the misrepresentation results in a contract. Unlike an action in negligence, which requires the Representee to prove that a duty of care existed, th e burden of proof is change by reversal the Act requires that the Representors prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe up the time the contract was made, that the facts represented were true, and unless they can do this, they will be liable. This can be difficult to prove a mere honest belief is not enough.Remedies available to the Representee are similar to those available for fraudulent misrepresentation unless the Representor is able to discharge this burden of proof (and if the Representor can discharge the burden, the Representee may still plead innocent misrepresentation with its consequent remedies). Effectively then, per Royscot devote Ltd, damages in respect of an honest but careless representation are to be calculated as if the representation had been made fraudulently this has attracted much criticism as it means in effect that the Courts are required to treat a person who is morally innocent as if he was guilty of fraud.However, under Section 2(1) the loss recoverable does not go beyond the consequences that arise from the negligent misrepresentation this is narrower than the recoverable loss permitted for fraudulent misrepresentation per Doyle v Olby. In addition, unlike damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, the Court may reduce the sum if there is evidence of contributory negligence on the part of the Representee.The damages under Section 2(1) will be based on direct consequence (as for the tort of fraud/deceit) rather than what was reasonably foreseeable (as for the tort of negligence). In Royscot Trust, the Court of collecting held that the correct measure of damages was based on the tort of deceit and that the Plaintiff was entitled to recover all losses even if those losses were unforeseeable, provided they were not otherwise too remote. Therefore, the measure for damages for innocent misrepresentation under Section 2(1) is the same measure as for fraudulent misrepresentation. This has since been questioned, howev er, and in Smith New Court Securities, Lord Steyn asked whether it was correct to treat a person who was morally innocent as if he were guilty of fraud when it comes to the measure of damages. This measure seems incorrect especially as, per Avon v Swire (where representations as to the rising were presented as statements as to existing intention), the section may be used to produce damages on a scale commensurate with fraud where otherwise the contract would allow no damages in the event of breach and there would be no damages for negligent misrepresentation in tort.Innocent MisrepresentationWhere the statement made is innocent, in that there is no provable fault, the remedy is rescission of the contract unless the Court awards damages at its discretion under Section 2(2) MA1967 alternatively it may award rescission with an indemnity the aim of the Court in all cases being not to unjustly enrich the Claimant. The equitable remedies that the Court may award discretionarily may inclu de the setting aside of a deed or other instrument and the restitution of property, with any pecuniary adjustment that expertness be necessary on either side by way of accounting for profits or allowance for depreciation. Although there is no indication as to the level of damages, it is considered that this should be lower than the damages awarded under Section 2(1), as implied by Section 2(3).The Court exercises its discretion in accordance with the principles of equity and so there may be no remedy offered if the facts as a whole make it inequitable to grant the relief, or if there is improper conduct or suggestion of a rough bargain on the part of the Representee.Mispresentation and blameworthiness shapesIt has been noted that misrepresentations can be made intentionally, carelessly or recklessly, or innocently. In each case, there is a remedy for the Representee but the value of that remedy varies based on several factors. We have seen that where fraudulent misrepresentation is proved (for which dishonesty is required), the level of damages awarded may be far greater than for other types of misrepresentation the Representor must pay all financial losses flowing directly from the misrepresentation. There are few limits to this the damages do not charter to be foreseeable and matters of the Representees conduct, such as the fact that he had the ability to avoid the contract or to discover the dishonesty, does not bar his claim. Similarly, his contributory negligence is irrelevant to the calculation of damages. The only restriction is that Representee needs to take reasonable steps to mitigate his consequential losses. Following the recent case of A v B, we have also seen that general damages may be available for distress suffered, even though this is not medical. beneath the MA1967, we have seen that a Representee can claim damages on a scale commensurate with fraud even where the representation was innocent, although these will be limited by any contri butory negligence. It seems unjust that the Representees contributory negligence is ignored in fraudulent misrepresentation this is fault per se on the part of the Representee and if the reason for allowing wider damages is blameworthiness, surely the blameworthiness of the Representee must also be a consideration. The European commence of considering all circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the Representee could reasonably acquire the information, seems fairer. The flexibility of this approach, in contrast to the illimitable scope of damages in English Law permitted for fraudulent misrepresentation, may demonstrate a better approach to the calculation of damages.The European approach may be contrasted to awards made for innocent misrepresentations in English law, which dramatize equitable principles in such cases the conduct of all parties is taken into consideration before reaching a decision. The fault of both parties is balance in order to reach a decision th at is fair to both, and such a system would make a more just compromise between the heavy benefits of a successful claim for fraudulent misrepresentation.It has also been noted that it is entirely illogical that the law should take such an iron-handed approach where the Representor makes a positive statement which he knows to be incorrect but provide no remedy whatsoever when the same person dishonestly fails to disclose a material fact that he knows would have a material bearing on the contract. James notes that the EU is taking tentative steps towards the abolition of national contract laws of member states, and the replacement with a individual European code. If this happens, we will see the introduction of a positive promise to act in good faith, both in pre-contractual negotiations and in the formation of contracts. This obligation on contracting parties to be open with each other in negotiations is foreign to English law it has previously been avoided because of principles o f contractual emancipation and economic efficiency. However, a model which requires honesty and diligence on the part of both parties, and provides for remedies to either party where there is a loss to be made good, with each partys conduct assessed for fairness, seems a far more balanced approach than the present system of remedies in English law for misrepresentation, and accords more with the principle of restitutio in integrum that is inherent throughout our contract law system.

Never Leave Your Family Behind English Literature Essay

Never Leave Your Family Behind English Literature peckkIn Flight Patterns the protagonist William, from the very beginning of the boloney, faces internal dispute within himself about his family and cast. He spends very little measure with them tho he as well has to do his work. Before he leaves for his business sex his wife pleads with him to stay and though his desire is to stay, he depose non. She urges him by axiom Oh, the piece of paper will be filled with other salesman. Let slightly other salesman sell what youre selling, (Alexie 38). Despite her attempts to make him stay, Will says approximatebye to his family and leaves legal residence. In many of Sherman Alexies stories he talks about the struggles of many contemporary inherent American families (Peterson 65). Fekadu, his taxi driver, starts telling him his life humbug and how he can non see his family. William realizes that he has a lot in common with the cab driver. Devastated by Fekadus story, William is quickly drawn to the idea that he too may lapse his family one day because he gave the impression that planes were evil, also the impression if he left he would leave his family in harms way and he also made him realize that work was taking too much of his family time and that is why he cancels his entire business rubberneck to stay home with his family.First, William decides to not go on the plane because Fekadu has made a proscribe impression of planes in his sub conscience. Neither William nor Fekadu understand it but Fekadus story is subliminally telling him that going on the plane is a ruinous idea. In Flight Patterns planes represent a one way ticket absent from home. I Fekadu kissed my wife and sons good-bye that morning, and I kissed my mother and father.. I went to the base, got into my plane, and flew by (Alexie 48). Williams daughter planted the seed to think that going on the plane is bad because she thought terrorist would hijack the plane and then Fekadu irriga te it by telling him he had to kill hundreds of people because he was single out of the air-force. Fekadu also tells him how he had to leave his country, family, and all his possessions behind and take his plane and fly to France (Alexie 49). Even though William is an active traveler, he has a bad image imprinted in his mind about planes. Fekadu is feeding him dark thoughts and that is influence his mind to not go on his flight. He is giving him the smell of loss since he lost his family because of a plane and William world power retrogress his too.Second, William did not go on the plane because he heard how Fekadu could not defend his family and from that he concluded that leaving his family would also leave them in harms way. Fekadu stated, I could only pray Selassie would leave them be. He had always been good to me, but he says me as impulsive, so I hoped he would pay off my family had nothing to do with my flight. (Alexie 49) Haile Selassie was an Emperor of Ethiopia.(Co lumbia Electronic Encyclopedia). When Fekadu was telling him that he would throw away bombs over cities and kill many people, William had a vision of his wife and daughter huddling terrified in the basement.(Alexie 48) He is upset because he is not in that respect to protect and be with them if they were ever in that situation. He could not exculpate himself if anything bad happens to them. The only way for him to be thither in quantify of need is if he quits his job. William feels worse when Fekadu tells him of how he was not there to defend his family. Fekadu left his wife and sons 30 years earlier when he defected from Selassies dictatorship by flying his military plane to France, where he standard asylum. Hes never seen them again (Wadsworth 1). The only way for him to be there for them in times of need is if he is with them and separated by work and this leads him to not go on the plane.Finally William decided not to go on the plane because work was taking too much time aw ay from his family. Work is the reason why William never gets to see his family. Work is the reason why Fekadu had to leave his family. He hated to leave but he loved his job, (Alexie 39). At the beginning of the story William was upset because he travels a lot and never spends time with his wife and daughter and after Fekadu told him his story Wills foundation was shaken. Fekadu told him that because of the work he used to have he can now never see his wife and children (Alexie 49). William fears the same thing mightiness happen to him. Fekadus story dealt with how he lost his family and had to deal with consequences of his work William felt up the same way too. He has a hard time accept what Fekadu has to say but he does not want to deal with what the individual he was describing had to go through and so he decided not to go on his business trip.In conclusion William could not go through with his business trip because he was devastated by Fekadus life story. He used him as an example and learned from him and his relationship with his family. He realized that flight represented distance from family and if he was distant he might lose them. William could not go through with his plans because he realized that if he is far away from the all the time he would never be able to protect them when they need his help. He also canceled his trip because work took time away from his family. Since Fekadus relationship with his family was ruined because of his work William took it as a lesson to put his family before his job. By the end of their journey to the airport, the men have found common cause, laughed together and understood each other. And William has found the dispel to follow his heart, (Wadsworth). William decided not to go because his heart and mind did not want to leave and after hearing Fekadus story William was encouraged to not leave his family behind. As a result he cancels his business trip and stays home with the family.

Leonardo da Vinci :: History Biography

da Vinci da VinciPainter, sculptor, inventor. Born April 15, 1452 near the village of Vinci, Italy. He was the illegitimate son of Ser Piero da Vinci, a prominent notary of Florence, who had no other children until over overmuch later. Ser Piero raised his son himself, a common manage at the time, organization for da Vincis mother to marry a villager. When da Vinci was 15, his male parent apprenticed him to Andrea del Verrocchio, the lead-in artist of Florence and a characteristic talent of the proto(prenominal) Renaissance. A sculptor, painter, and goldsmith, Verrocchio was a remarkable craftsman, and his great skill and passionate come to for quality of execution, as wellhead as his interest in expressing the racy mobility of the human figure, were weighty elements in Leonardos artistic formation. Indeed, much in Leonardos feeler to art was evolutionary from tradition rather than revolutionary against it, although the opposite is practically true of his results. afterwa rds completing his apprenticeship, Leonardo stayed on as an ally in Verrocchios shop, and his earliest known word-painting is a product of his collaborationism with the master. In Verrocchios Baptism of the Nazarene (ca. 1475), Leonardo executed one of the two angels, a fact already recorded in the 16th century, as well as the removed landscape, and he added the final touches to the figure of Christ, determining the cereal of the flesh. Collaboration on a major project by a master and his supporter was standard procedure in the Italian Renaissance. What is picky is that Leonardos work is not, as was usual, a slightly less skilled adjustment of Verrocchios manner of painting but an original approach altering it. It all possesses all the profound qualities of Leonardos mature style and implies a criticism of the proto(prenominal) Renaissance. By changing hard metallic surface effects to cottony yielding ones, qualification edges less cutting, and increasing the slight modulations of light and shade, Leonardo evoked a new flexibility within the figures. This soft union, as Giorgio Vasari called it, is also devote in the special lighting and is emphatically genuine in the gyrate turn of the angels head and body and the vast sagacity of the landscape.Apparently Leonardo had painted one extant work, the Annunciation in Florence, before this. It is much nearer to Verrocchio in the stability of the two figures shown in profile, the clean clearcutness of the decorative details, and the large simple shapes of the trees, but it already differs in the creamier fashion model of the faces.Leonardo da Vinci History BiographyLeonardo da VinciPainter, sculptor, inventor. Born April 15, 1452 near the village of Vinci, Italy. He was the illegitimate son of Ser Piero da Vinci, a prominent notary of Florence, who had no other children until much later. Ser Piero raised his son himself, a common practice at the time, arranging for Leonardos mother to marry a villager. When Leonardo was 15, his father apprenticed him to Andrea del Verrocchio, the leading artist of Florence and a characteristic talent of the early Renaissance. A sculptor, painter, and goldsmith, Verrocchio was a remarkable craftsman, and his great skill and passionate concern for quality of execution, as well as his interest in expressing the vital mobility of the human figure, were important elements in Leonardos artistic formation. Indeed, much in Leonardos approach to art was evolutionary from tradition rather than revolutionary against it, although the opposite is often true of his results.After completing his apprenticeship, Leonardo stayed on as an assistant in Verrocchios shop, and his earliest known painting is a product of his collaboration with the master. In Verrocchios Baptism of Christ (ca. 1475), Leonardo executed one of the two angels, a fact already recorded in the 16th century, as well as the distant landscape, and he added the final touches to the figu re of Christ, determining the texture of the flesh. Collaboration on a major project by a master and his assistant was standard procedure in the Italian Renaissance. What is special is that Leonardos work is not, as was usual, a slightly less skilled version of Verrocchios manner of painting but an original approach altering it. It completely possesses all the fundamental qualities of Leonardos mature style and implies a criticism of the early Renaissance. By changing hard metallic surface effects to soft yielding ones, making edges less cutting, and increasing the slight modulations of light and shade, Leonardo evoked a new flexibility within the figures. This soft union, as Giorgio Vasari called it, is also present in the special lighting and is emphatically developed in the spiral turn of the angels head and body and the vast depth of the landscape.Apparently Leonardo had painted one extant work, the Annunciation in Florence, before this. It is much nearer to Verrocchio in the st ability of the two figures shown in profile, the clean precision of the decorative details, and the large simple shapes of the trees, but it already differs in the creamier modeling of the faces.

Welfare to Work Advertisement :: Advertising Marketing

eudaimonia to work This ad claims that just ab bug out batch on wellbeing truly do non wish to be living this way. The advertisement claims that the mod benefit reform laws have helped to detect legion(predicate) people take out of upbeat and into jobs. With the help of companies who will engross these job-seekers, the advertisement states that million of others prat do the same. People who receive dischargebeat according to this advertisement, be not looking for a handout, scarcely are actively seeking jobs, so they can become more self-sufficient. This advertisement implies that the public sensing of wellbeing recipients is a negative one. Unfortunately, in our society, at that place is an attitude toward public assistance clients because many people apparently believe, according to the Ad council, that these clients are taking property from those who work hard for it themselves, calling this a hand-out. Our society appears to believe that welfare clients wish for, and have, an easy life, free of having to work. The reality of this concept is that people on welfare are not circumscribe to scarcely get a check. This service announcement works toward changing this close-minded suggesting that most welfare clients wish to take control of their lives. They cay a very diverse picture of what these clients truly wish to achieve, kind of than what is apparently expected of them by the public. In addition, they try to place a human face on the problem by stating from the beginning that most people on welfare want jobs and being sympathetic but direct. Supporting their claims, the advertisement pose factual evidence of the millions of people who, plump year alone, worked to get themselves off of welfare and into working for a rhythmical paycheck. These people believe that make up more companies and welfare clients would benefit if everyone would escaped their doors to those not seeking just a handout. The most effective leave-ta king of this advertisement may be its use of a common message, scratched out in order to be replaced with a more positive message. By showing the difference amidst perception and reality, the writers of this advertisement hope to move on others to change their views. Their primary localise on the companies who can benefit by hiring someone off of welfare. The address is to help change public perception and to open new doors for welfare clients, targeting companies who presently do not film these clients.Welfare to Work advertizing Advertising MarketingWelfare to work This advertisement claims that most people on welfare truly do not wish to be living this way. The advertisement claims that the new welfare reform laws have helped to get many people off of welfare and into jobs. With the help of companies who will employ these job-seekers, the advertisement states that million of others can do the same. People who receive welfare according to this advertisement, are not looking for a handout, but are actively seeking jobs, so they can become more self-sufficient. This advertisement implies that the public perception of welfare recipients is a negative one. Unfortunately, in our society, there is an attitude toward welfare clients because many people apparently believe, according to the Ad council, that these clients are taking money from those who work hard for it themselves, calling this a hand-out. Our society appears to believe that welfare clients wish for, and have, an easy life, free of having to work. The reality of this concept is that people on welfare are not content to just get a check. This service announcement works toward changing this close-minded suggesting that most welfare clients wish to take control of their lives. They paint a very different picture of what these clients truly wish to achieve, rather than what is apparently expected of them by the public. In addition, they try to place a human face on the problem by stating fr om the beginning that most people on welfare want jobs and being sympathetic but direct. Supporting their claims, the advertisement present factual evidence of the millions of people who, last year alone, worked to get themselves off of welfare and into working for a regular paycheck. These people believe that even more companies and welfare clients would benefit if everyone would open their doors to those not seeking just a handout. The most effective part of this advertisement may be its use of a common message, scratched out in order to be replaced with a more positive message. By showing the difference between perception and reality, the writers of this advertisement hope to encourage others to change their views. Their primary focus on the companies who can benefit by hiring someone off of welfare. The goal is to help change public perception and to open new doors for welfare clients, targeting companies who presently do not hire these clients.

The Little Prince by Antoine de St. Exupery :: Prince Antoine Exupery Essays

The microscopic Prince by Antoine de St. Exupery The Little Prince by Antoine de St. Exupery is a howling(prenominal) novel. The Little Prince was origin ally written in French in 1943 as Le Petit Prince. It was then translated to English by Katherine Woods. The Little Prince is the story of a young boy from another planet who ventures from his home to discover impudently worlds. In the process, he catch up withs friends and teaches valuable lessons. St. Exupery places himself as the narrator and author of this story. St. Exupery tells of how he went down in his airplane in the middle of the desert and meets a little prince from another planet. The little prince tells the author/pilot about all of the people and animals he has met since he set out on his voyage. In the process, the readers eyes are opened to many of the mysteries of life.To make a cracking book, there are certain criterion which a book must meet. A book needs to be socialize so the reader will enjoy it and cont inue to read on. A great novel needs to be well written. It should have a message or a lesson for the reader to pick up on. only great literature also needs to be timeless so it can be applied in different times and places. The Little Prince is a good novel, in great part, because it has very entertaining characters. quality of what makes these characters so enjoyable is the fact they are each a paradox. The prince is an interest character to follow through the book. The way the little prince never answers anyone elses questions, thus far always expects answers to his own, is amusing. He is childlike in appearance yet seems older in his wisdom. The author of the story is captivating, because his character gives a great deal of insight into the thoughts of adults. The author is also childlike, in his hope that he will one day find another person who looks to a lower place the surface of things. Another character, the wise fox, is the princes first friend on the Earth. The fox app ears to be a silly animal at first, by and by one reads on, however, they discover he is not silly at all. in addition the rose, the princes love, is very arrogant yet charming. The snake, whom the prince meets his first night on Earth, is dangerous yet helpful at the end when he assists the prince in returning to his home planet.

Literature Supports Children’s Personality Development Essay -- Psycho

Personality study is the development of the organised pattern of behaviors and attitudes that makes a person distinctive (Laberge, 2006). Adults, especially p bents and teachers, are top dog components of these environments and therefore play a powerful role in fate or hindering children in their temper and cognitive development (Morrison, 2007, p. 99). agree to Erikson (2007), childrens personalities and social skills grow and develop within the context of corporation and in response to societys demands, expectations, values, and social institutions, such as families, schools, and other child care programs (pp. 98-99). Children personality does not occur everywhere night. They learn and experience new things in life and how they relate to these experiences equal their personality. Erik Erickson (1902-1994), is a well-known German psychoanalyst that based his theory of psychosocial development on the premise that cognitive and social development occur great deal in hand and bednot be separated (Morrison, 2007, p. 125). Erickson also strived to explain personality growth by describing how human beings respond to potential conflicts at item periods in their lives (Giorgis and Glazer, 2009, p. 171). He described and explained his eight stages of psychological development, in which the world-class four of the stages relates to early childhood children.1.Infancy Birth-18 months oldBasic hope vs. Mistrust- HopeDuring the first stage, the first or second year of life, the major emphasis is on the whether the child develops trust. Children learn to trust or distrust their environment and their caregivers. Trust develops when childrens needs are met consistently, predictable, and lovingly (Morrison, 2007, p. 126) therefor... ... as they grow. The little snail in this book had to learn that being distinguishable is not always good. Both books are good for parents and children to share a new adventure in life changing experiences, whether the baby is not the baby anymore, but a big brother or baby or if the early child is not happy about who they are until they see that who they want to be is not what they expect. Literature can result young children adventures they may never experience in their life time. For those young children, who do experience adventures in their life, they need good age capture literature in their lives to show them different ways on how to deal, cope, or function in their life. A childs personality can be supported and nurtured if they are given opportunities to explore and learn from their environment, whether the acquisition is exploring or reading a good book.

Reunion by John Cheever :: English Literature Essays

Reunion, by John Cheever, is a story told through and through the eyes of a young boy, Charlie, who is recalling a meeting with his father who he hasnt seen for more than three years. It is set in New York w here Charlies father lives. He meets up with his father during a stop everyplace amid matchs. In the first divide we are introduced to Charlie and his father. Charlie is very lots looking forward to meeting his father who he hasnt seen since his parents disassociate three years before. He was a stranger to me, shows that Charlie is anxious rough his up approach path meeting with his father. still he then goes on to affirm But as soon as I saw him I felt he was my father. This then implies to the reader that Charlie is a petite more relaxed when he sees his father. This sentence is so powerful beca drug abuse of its use of the member father. The strong connotations, which are related to this word, express the relationship between the two characters. At this stage of the s tory we are compelled to feel a little bit sorry for Charlie who has been separated from his father. Charlies father is besides introduced in the first paragraph. He, who is never given a name during the story, forms the digit in the readers mind of a high-flying businessman. Cheever relays this image with the use of formal language during the communications between Charlie and his father, His secretary wrote to say that he would meet me at the information booth at noon. This in contrast to the less formal style of writing used when Charlie is involved, at 12 oclock sharp I saw him coming. That last quote also shows that his father is punctual which strengthens the businessman stomp we have already placed him in. Early on we are go by to believe that Charlie and his father are happy to see each another(prenominal) and have a good relationship with quotes such as, I was outrageously happy to see him again and Hi Charlie, Hi boy But these attitudes towards father and son are sho rt lived. Towards the end of the first paragraph we begin to get more of an insight into what Charlies father is truly like. The first example of this is Id like to take you up to my club, but its in the Sixties, and if you have to catch an early train I guess wed better get something around here.

Jake - Original Essay -- Papers

Jake - Original Essay I pushed off onto the ice whoosh I felt up alive. I looked just about at children laughing and falling, young lovers skate round and round, hand in hand. I turned to see Jake locomote toward me, a look of boyish glee on his face. I smiled and took his out-stretched, gloved hand in mine. We lapped the frozen lake together in synchrony, talking, laughing and primarily showing off, when Jake decided to show me, and everyone else on the opaque ice, what he was make of. He sped off, jumping and twisting like half of Torville and Dean, receiving many admiring glances as he landed, sure-footed, back on the ice. Bet you cant beat that he laughed crosswise to me, his heavy breathe coming out cloudy in attend of him. I couldnt ignore a challenge like that. I flew across the ice as though I had sprouted wings, oblivious to the cheers and shouts around me. I jumped, twisted, pirouetted and twirled elegantly, breathing in the sweet, pine- scented air. Torville was always the better half of the glide partnership. I skated back toward Jake, a triumphant smile flitting across my face. on the all told at once the ice gave way beneath me I didnt so far have time to scream before a chasm opened up, swallowed me whole and the freezing water surrounded me. A memory flashed this had happened before. I was whole six and past but the same fear I had then burned through my mind and palled my body. I pushed upward, but my sodden clothe pulled me under down, down. I tried to kick the heavy boots off my numb feet and pushed one last time. My outstretched fingers hit solid ice. I clawed and desperately clutched at the ice trying to find the... ...e drugs out of my stomach. mom crying again and angry at me for so selfishly abstracted to waste my intent in this way. Not that I cared then, but that was then and this is now. Waking up in the hospital once again, I felt the weight of depression that had pulled me down, like my clothes and boots under the ice, had lifted from me. I knew nothing would ever replace Jake and that my life would never truly be whole without him in it but somehow, some way after 2 close encounters with death I had seen a light and realised that life was a precious gift not to be wasted. It was different difference the hospital with mum this time, knowing I was going home to first-class honours degree afresh. This time, instead of calling Jake, I went to say goodbye carefully displace all the things he had given to me in the box before skid it under my bed.

Kants Theory of Deontology and Euthanasia Essay -- Kant Assisted Suic

I am going to apply the theory of Kants Deontology to the case regarding assisted felo-de-se for mental suffering. Based on Kants theory, I have found suicide morally unjust. This case is about euthanasia and assisted suicide. On kinsfolk 28, 1991, Dr. Boudewijn Chabot administered a sufficient amount of sleeping pills and a liquid medicate mixture to a patient with the intentions of assisting the patient with death. The patient, Hilly Bosscher, was suffering from depression, and psychological pain. She was recently divorced from a 25 year abusive relationship, and her deuce sons had died. The doctor determined she suffered from unbearable pain, genuinely want to die, and freely and competently made such a request. On the same(p) day Dr. Chabot administered the medici...

Attack on World Trade Center :: history

Attack on World concern CenterTerrorism is the ride of 21 century. Throughout history it has appeared in many various slipway hijacked planes, ships, trains. But never was terrorism committed in such a terrible way as on Tuesday, September 11 in New York City. This tragedy affected us completely. It was nice Tuesday morning. Everybody were rushing to their jobs in the most beautiful and remarkable city of the homo. Planes in the sky were rough-cut routine of this city at this time. Manhattan was ready to welcome millions of its residents and tourist. Everybody were going close to their businesses. There was illusion that nothing can disturb this normal existence. Rapidly, ii passenger planes, like envoys of terror, crashed into both towers of the World Trade Center. Pieces of debris came heap with a terrifying thunder. Screams of terror could be heard through police van of thousands people from all over the world. Ten minutes later, people all over the world with shocking business organization could observe how two highest buildings of the world were collapsing carrying away thousands of innocent lives. People stood staring in awe at the empty space, which once was the Tenth Wonder of the World. Now, this is just a infect of dust. Many firefighters and police officers rushed into the burning buildings to save innocent lives. At this time they werent thinking about their own lives. I woke up about 9 oclock. As usual I turned on the TV. I saw a terrible image of one tower and a lot of smoke was coming out of it. Still not realizing what was happening, I went to another room to pack my stuff in browse to go to college. At this time I was thinking that it was just a regular fire and nothing serious. When I got on the bus I saw unusual commotion among people. I could feel panic and fear among people. I wanted to use my cell phone to call my mavin to find out if hes ok, but it did not work. Everybody were talking about the attacks of terrorists, but I never thought that World Trade Center could collapse, just disappear. I heard that Twin Towers collapsed when I was in my music class. I still could not realize what was happening in NY. I got out from Brooklyn College and I went to Flatbush Avenue. There I saw skies sufficient of black smoke.

Shakespeares Othello - Why did Othello Marry? :: GCSE English Literature Coursework

Why did Othello Marry?   Why did Othello marry is a complex question, the obvious answer would be that he loves Desdemona, but why does he love her and why does his love turn to hate so quickly in Act III scene 3 requires oft thought and consideration. Othello likes people to be plain and open because that is what he himself is, he has grown to become his image, he is only on the surface, he hides zip because that is his image, to only have one side, the military side. Thus Desdemona also seems to him actually open, he likes her because he thinks she is like him however when he finds that she might be hiding something from him then he stops loving her. At the resembling time Othello needs a wife to complete his image, she is the proof that he is a successful general and Christian and he can head her off as such. Othello loves or thinks he loves Desdemona for many reasons, not least(prenominal) because he thinks she is like him. He thinks it will be a bully relationsh ip because she seems to be in his eyes just like a soldier thus like him so that he attracted her while apprisal her tales of his battles as seen in Act I scene 3 She love me for the dangers I has passed. He talks to her as he talks to a soldier using images of war and might May the winds blow bowl they have wakened death, And let the labouring bark climb hills of seas. Because she comes with him to the wars, she becomes even to a greater extent in his mind one of his soldiers so that after he comes buttocks to Cyprus he greets her with O, my fair warrior. Othello can not cope with anybody who is different from him, who he cannot understand so that because he sees so much of himself in Desdemona he loves her. She is his hard bright surface because she reflects his image when he looks at her. She is commanding, orthogonal and self-confident which he sees as his own best qualities. She shows how commanding and alacrity she is when she first answers her father in Act I scene 3 &nb sp To you I am bound for life and study My life and education both do learn me How to respect you.

Odd Couple :: essays papers

quaint CoupleThemes and characters are most a lot the key factors thatinfluence a writers work. Most of the time the author has no controloer this influence. This is clearly shown in Neil Simons play, TheOdd Couple. Not only when is Simons own life depicted in his play, butalso the lives of those taut to him, can be parallel to his work. NeilSimons life is depicted in his characters and themes of his play, TheOdd Couple.Marvin Neil Simon was born in the Bronx on July 4, 1927. Hisfather, Irving, was a salesman in Manhattans garment district hismother Mamie worked in Gimbels department store. The family moved toWashington Heights, in Union Manhattan, when Simon was young.Irving was an errant husband who occasionally abandoned the familyaltogether, leaving Mamie, a bilk and bitter women, alone to dealwith Neil and his older brother Danny. Eventually, the parents weredivorced, and Neil went to live with relatives in Queens. From anearly age, he exhibited a quick wit and an active imagination. Heloved films and was often asked to leave the theater for laughing toloud. In noble school, Simon was sometimes ostracized as a Jew, anexperience that would later inform his work. Meanwhile, he and hisbrother began collaborating on comedy material that they sold tostand-up comics and wireless announcers. Simon graduated from DeWittClinton High School in 1944 at the age of sixteen(Magill2216).He entered bran-new York University under the US Army AirforceReserve Program. throughout his military career, he wrote formany military newspapers. Discharged in 1946, Simon took a job in themail room at Warner Brothers in New York, where Danny worked in thepublicity department. The brothers were soon hired to write forGoodman Ace of CBS, and over the next decade they provided material formany popular comedians. During the summers of 1952 and 1953, theywrote sketches for a professional person acting company at tent Tamiment, inPennsylvania.At Camp Tamiment, S imon fell in love with a young actress named JoanBaim, and the couple was marry on September 30, 1953. Five yearslater, Joan gave birth to a daughter, Ellen a second daughter, Nancy,was born in 1963(Magill2261).In 1956, when Danny Simon moved to California to be a television receiver director, Neil stayed in New York and wrote for manypopular television shows. He also adapted broadway plays fortelevision. By the later 1950s, however, he precious more independence

Life in a Small Village in Greece :: essays papers

Life in a Small hamlet in GreeceThis paper is based upon the biography of a couple that is bread and butter in Playiari, which is a village 25 km from Thessaloniki, Greece. The couple is troika old age married, after being four age engaged, and now they argon alive at a house of their own. They do not submit all children, so far, but they have a dog whose pull in is Lambros. Their names are Tasos and Efi. He is the owner of a caf and she is working at a branch of an insurance company. I met them al or so six long time past when I got hired by Tasos as a waiter in his caf, and I chose them for my paper because first of all I intent actually comfortable with them and second because they are young so the search that is outlet to be done to be more vivid and up to date. What is issue to be presented in this paper are the various reading that I have obtained from them, for several aspects of their lives. Furthermore, what is to be accomplished is the simile of th eir lives with those of their grandparents and on board with this the comparison and contrast of these information with the ones in the articles that were covered in class. first off what is to be conferred are information about Tasos family. Tasos family originated from Kallipoli which was a suburb of Constantinople (Instanbul). They were backup in that respect before the destruction of Asia Minor and the exchange of population surrounded by Greece and flop taking place. When the exchange of the populations took place his grandfather go like a shot to Playiari, which essentially is a village composed of immigrants who came from on that slur and at that point in time was nothing but a complex of 4-5 houses. Their residents were locals, who had conflicts with the first appearance people, because they did not want others to lease land in that territory. Finally most of the immigrants got to claim and own a piece of land. Tasos was born 32 age ago in Edessa, a city c lose to Thessaloniki. When he was both years old his family moved in a village, which was located in the district(nomos) Pelas and it is called St.George. They remained there for about nine years, until Tasos became 11 years old, and after that they moved to Lakoma, a village in Halkidiki.Life in a Small settlement in Greece essays papersLife in a Small Village in GreeceThis paper is based upon the biography of a couple that is living in Playiari, which is a village 25 km from Thessaloniki, Greece. The couple is three years married, after being four years engaged, and now they are living at a house of their own. They do not have any children, so far, but they have a dog whose name is Lambros. Their names are Tasos and Efi. He is the owner of a caf and she is working at a branch of an insurance company. I met them almost six years ago when I got hired by Tasos as a waiter in his caf, and I chose them for my paper because first of all I feel really comfortable with them and second because they are young so the research that is going to be done to be more vivid and up to date. What is going to be presented in this paper are the various information that I have obtained from them, for several aspects of their lives. Furthermore, what is to be accomplished is the comparison of their lives with those of their grandparents and alongside with this the comparison and contrast of these information with the ones in the articles that were covered in class. Firstly what is to be conferred are information about Tasos family. Tasos family originated from Kallipoli which was a suburb of Constantinople (Instanbul). They were living there before the destruction of Asia Minor and the exchange of population between Greece and Turkey taking place. When the exchange of the populations took place his grandfather moved straight to Playiari, which basically is a village composed of immigrants who came from there and at that point in time was nothing but a complex of 4-5 houses. Their residents were locals, who had conflicts with the incoming people, because they did not want others to claim land in that territory. Finally most of the immigrants got to claim and own a piece of land. Tasos was born 32 years ago in Edessa, a city close to Thessaloniki. When he was two years old his family moved in a village, which was located in the district(nomos) Pelas and it is called St.George. They remained there for about nine years, until Tasos became 11 years old, and after that they moved to Lakoma, a village in Halkidiki.

Electronic Product Code Project Essay -- Business Management Marketing

electronic Product Code Project give in of ContentsExecutive Overview3Stage 1 Determination of chain of mountains and Objectives....4Stage 2 Systems Investigation and Feasibility.4Stage 3 Systems psychoanalysis.7 UPC DFD (Legacy System)....9Stage 4 System Design.9Stage 5 position System Design.10EPC DFD (New System)14Stage 6 Implementation.. 14Stage 7 Changeover.15Stage 8 Evaluation and sustentation...17Appendix A Cost Benefit Analysis Chart19References...................23 Executive OverviewAs a small grocery chain we ar currently struggling to maintain our revenue stream and profitability against the competitory threats of the global w arehouse chains (Costco, Wal-Mart, etc). We continue to find ourselves behind the thin out in this competitive situation. These larger retailers have been able to use their great resources and economies of scale to not only beat us on hail but also industry innovation. According to the electronic periodical Baseline, several(prenomin al) dozen retailers and suppliers, including Unilever, Coca-Cola, Kraft Foods, and Wal-Mart have signed on to the next coevals UPC called the Electronic Product Code (EPC), (Mullin, 2002). With the implementation of this technology a node will be able to virtually walk through a store, collect all their groceries, and walk out without ever having to stop for a cashier or checkout procedure. The electronic retail chain vanquish Buy, which sells electronic devices along with household appliances, implemented this technology in legion(predicate) of its stores and has increased revenue, along with customer satisfaction due to always having straightlaced stock on hand. We believe that this innovation will have a profound effect on our customer base, especially the highly desired, petty attention span, and technically astute demographic of the 20-45 year olds. There are many other large retailers looking at this technology for the alike reason (increased revenue) and studies show t hat smaller retailers would be willing to implement this analogous technology if initial installation costs decreased (2002). Our groc... ...illion USD 0.002 USDReduction in Unsaleables 3.0 cardinal USD 0.001 USDReduction in Out-of-Stock 4.2 million USD 0.002 USDPoint of Sale qualification 7.5 million USD 0.003 USDTotal savings at outlets 46.9 million USD 0.022 USDEstimated Costs annual Costs 9.7 million USD Tag Costs 0.0 million USD One-time Costs 96.6 million USD Integration Cost 7.8 million USD Reader Costs (including installation) 88.7 million USD It is fictional that all tags costs are carried by your supply chain partnersReferencesMullin, Eileen (September 5, 2002). Electronic Product Code, Baseline, Retrieved February, 17th 2004 from http//www.baselinemag.comEPC Global Website http//archive.epcglobalinc.org/aboutthet ech.asp AARFID Incorporated Website http//www.aarfid.com/middleware.htmlRFID News Website http//www.rfidnews.org/RFID Journal Website http//www.rfidjournal.com/ bind/archive/9?topics=9&imageField2.x=11&imageField2.y=5RFID Online Source ledger http//www.frontlinemagazine.com/rfidonline/

Stephen Cranes The Monster as the Most Important work of short fiction

At once a childrens tale, a grim affectionate satire, an ambitious study of ethical responsibility, a painful examination of belt along in America, a devastating account of the village virusThe daimon by Stephen Crane, has been interpreted as the most significant work of go around fiction written before 1900. It is a compilation of different issues apply to highlight the racist attitudes and xenophobia evident in the USA afterwards bondage was abolished in 1863. Despite the fictional plot, the views of the white population of Whilomville are found on fact, as the racist feelings were still palpable evinced by disparaging terms such as Negro. Along with the wash drawing struggle, neighborly satire is apparent, as evidently the story is classified as grey Gothic. With a Gothic overtone Crane is able to explore the satirical society in which the story is set, to delve into concerns of social satire, ethical responsibility, race struggles and the village virus.Throughout The Monster, Crane exemplifies the social hypocrisy and identifies this as an issue in contemporary society. Before heat content became rottenly seared, he was high in social status. This is portrayed with descriptions of the towns-people of Whilomville, which is place loosely based on Cranes puerility hometown of Port Jervis, New Jersey. He was a well-bred gentleman, who was eer given quiet admonitions and compliments. Miss Bella Farragut exclaimed that Misteh Johnsing was simply divine, as they were soon to be engaged. Their opinions though, were greatly reversed after the fire incident, when his reflection had simply been burned away. When Alek, his ol frien, first saw Henry after the accident, he gasped for a second, and then yelled the yell of... ...o mock and jest at Henry, by chasing him, firing rocks. Similarly, hierarchy is central to society. There is a black eye in the social ladder, as Henry was a dominant figure, entirely after the incident this was over turned due to his appearance. However, it is ironic as Henrys deed is the indisputable act, as he does not comment others, and he performs the act of ultimate kindness jeopardising his own life to economy Jimmie from the fire. The Monster is depicted as the most significant work of short-change fiction written before 1900, primarily because Crane has used the grey Gothic subgenre, in order to accumulate an abundance of issues such as racism and the village virus. Crane exploited small-town experiences to illustrate the flaws in the community, to present a microcosm and a warning for the readers, to deter them from becoming the seeming(prenominal) monsters.

In What Ways Do You Think That The Dreams Of The Characters Are :: English Literature

In What slipway Do You Think That The Dreams Of The Characters AreDifferent From Reality And To What Extent go forth They Be Fulfilled?The American Dream can be de disceptationate as the idea that America is the landof opportunity for everyone who is willing to discipline hard and persevere.It was seen as the land of freedom where everyone has a chance of pursuance of happiness. The USA was seen as a place of equalopportunities for anyone, one of the reasons beingness that there was noclass system like there were in Britain. Dramatic irony links in withthis idea of the Wingfield family living in the middle of the AmericanDream. It involves us in the play but as it is a memory play, dramaticirony does not make us feel part of it. It reminds us that we are onthe outside aspect in and also that we live in a different condemnationperiod than the one in which the play is set. We, as the audience opena great deal of insight into the play, and therefore we know thatthere is no real truth in the American Dream. It is just a mythbecause the play is set in the 1930s, which was the period of theGreat Depression. The American economy had collapsed due to the WallStreet Crash, so it would have been some impossible for theAmerican Dream to work for someone like Jim.Jim is Tennessee Williams important focus point of all the charactersdreams as he is the long retard but always expected something thatthe Wingfield family have been waiting for. He is the most significantcharacter in the play who can be associate to the American Dream. In thefilm version, Jim is visualised as an ordinary man, which is bilk for us as we find it impossible to believe that he issuch(prenominal)(prenominal) a central character and that all the dreams of the Wingfieldsdepend upon him. Knowledge - Zzzzp money - Zzzzzp - PowerThats the cycle democracy is built onWhen he pitches this line to Laura, we wonder that how can a personwho believes in this absurdity, be such a central character in theplay if he is portrayed like this. The agent who plays Jim in the filmmakes him seem extremely stupid. The actor does not give theimpression that Jim is very important and it does not mark thefact that he is such a major character, which is why I feel that theportrayal of Jim is unsuccessful.Jim strongly believes that he will be capable to obtain an executive post

Courtship Vs. Dating Essays -- essays research papers

Courtship - the feat of wooingWoo - to ask in marriage to court, to solicit thirstily to seek to gain.You ask, What in the world is Courtship? Let me start by saying it is our countrys go out problem solution. Not alike long ago, Christian p arnts along with their youth had realized the need to re-map the pathway to fruitful, God-ordained marriages. The result has been a push particularly among homeschoolers, to return to the more scriptural principals of courtship.Simply defined, courtship is a reformed version of dating under the supervision of parents between a man and a woman who are ready to marry in the near future. In consumer terms, contemporary dating is the equivalent to window-shopping and courtship is shopping w/ cash in upset under the direction of experienced buyers. The te...

Brothers of the Bible Essay -- Christianity God Jesus Cain Abel Essays

Brothers of the BibleThe former(a) Testament sibling rivalries between Cain and Abel, Esau and Jacob, and Joseph and his brothers were similar in some ways and different in others, tho they all adjudge les watchwords for us today, for brothers today still face many of the same problems in life that challenged brothers thousands of years ago.Cain and Abel were in a situation much more(prenominal) unique than Esau and Jacob, and Joseph and his brothers faced, for the society they lived in was extremely small, and they each had a transport relationship with divinity fudge. As the book of Genesis tells us, Cain was the first born son of Adam and Eve. Their next son was a boy whom they named Abel. As Cain and Abel grew up both took responsibilities for making a living. Abel took care of the sheep and Cain became a farmer. (Genesis 47) twain brothers in the space of time began to offer sacrifices unto beau ideal. Cain, being a farmer, offered the contract of his fields, and Abel of fered the first-born sheep with its fat. God had respect for the offering of Abel but rejected the offering of Cain. It thence comes as something of a surprise that God accepts Abel?s offering but not Cain?s. Two puzzles emerge (1) We are not told how Cain discovered that neither he nor his offering was accepted. Given God?s way of responding in the story, Cain may have told directly. (2) No rationale is given, hence God?s action appears arbitrary (Abingdon, 373). The biblical text gives no explicit cogitate for God?s preference for Abel?s offering. This has given rise to speculation. (Doubleday) And grasping of his brother so angered Cain that he killed him. Cain?s response ? the down(p) face ? reveals more the idea of dejection, feelings associated with rejection, than anger. Cain must care about what God thinks of him and his sacrifice. But the basic issue becomes not that Cain acts in a dispirit fashion, but how he responds to God?s interaction with him about his dejection. That God responds at all reveals a divine concern for Cain. (Abingdon, 373)When God confronted Cain with what he had done and asked, ?Where is Abel your brother Cain replied, ?Am I my brother?s shop steward (Genesis 415) The answer is yes, and relates to Esau and Jacob, Joseph and his brothers, and to us today, for we are all our brother?s keeper. We live our lives in close relation to our family, neighbors, friends, and even people we only casually me... ...howing us that when the ancient Israelites got involved in sibling rivalries they didn?t fool around, they also illustrate for modern day readers how harmful paternal favoritism can be. Today?s parents should make every drive to treat their children equally, for the psychological consequences may be severe if they don?t. Finally, these Old Testament stories demonstrate to us today that sibling rivalries can be controlled if brothers or sisters make efforts to treat one another(prenominal) fairly. They show us as well that i t is very important for siblings to forgive one another if their rivalries lead to hard feelings or even lengthy estrangement. BibliographyAbingdon. The New vox?s Bible, loudness 1. Nashville, TN Abingdon Press, 1994.Chait, Israel. ?Joseph and His Brothers.? Online. Available http//www.mesora.org/_private/mesora.html. 20 June 2001. Doubleday. The Anchor Bible Dictionary, Volume 1. New York Doubleday Dell Pulbishing group, 1992.Smith, Dictionary of the Bible. London, 1893.The Holy Bible. New York Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1983.White, Ellen G. Patriarchs and Prophets. cap D.C. Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1958.