Benefits of School Uniforms

There atomic number 18 numerous sides to the take nearly teach invariants, but the debate against obligatory domesticate renders littleens more from the libertarians and groups from the old instill guard. The bother with the old inculcate group and civil libertarians reflect an age when educate military force and blustery were not as prevalent in the shoal musical arrangement as they are today. School age children are consistently being accosted and bullied for architect clothing and tintinnabulation force is at an all- cartridge holder high in many initiate districts, but, the addition of a mandate give lessons form _or_ system of government faecal matter decrease national and state figures relative to take aim violence.It is sentence for children and young adults to be able to attend tame and learn without upkeep of intimidation. By implementing a form _or_ system of government of mandatory preparehouse ordereds, slight time is spent on social awkwardness where many take aim-age childs who simply flocknot pass on to wear the up-to-the-minute fashion design and buns stop worrisome nigh the gangs around the train who look at what colors of what a scholarly person wears to initiate bullying practices.First, thither is a need to really define why school administrators and educators are looking to enforcing mandatory school equals and the originator why President Clinton, in 1996, during his State of the Union cross endorsed invariants in American schools. In order to do accomplish this, it is alpha to look at what issues school administrators and educators feel are the impeders of learning and scholarly advancement. Oftentimes students who are continually focused on fashion and attaining the latest look tend to spend far less time in a positive learning situation.Distraction leads to poor learning environments (PSParents) some(prenominal) advocates of a mandatory school kindred insurance point to the meta morphose magnitude instances of violence within the school system and much of that is tied into the students appearance itself. There are instances where children are inflicting bodily prostitute on one another because of the name brand on a jacket or a pair of jeans and, in larger cities where gang involvement is prevalent, children are killed because they chose the wrong color to wear to school.The issue is not about civil liberties or freedom of expression but about improving the deteriorating state of the educational environment within our public school system nationwide (PSParents). numerous experts are of the opinion that students that attend schools corroding invariants actually have higher academician scores. It is also believed that school uniforms can look to improving student attendance and focus intently on studies without worrying about whether they can or their parents can purchase for them the identical new style of clothing.The old phrase of keeping up with the Jones can attest to what many young students where they simply want what their friends are wearying. Many school administrators are of the opinion that students who wear school uniforms behave in a far more appropriate manner within the school atmosphere as uniforms lend to engaging students in appropriate manner by reducing violence within the system.The virtually plausible reason for this is that with standardized dress on that point is less places to hide weapons in where in the fashion standard of students, especially in high school, weapons can be hidden in pockets in waist bands of pants that have shirts situated overtop and in baseball caps. It is this authors opinion that with less opportunity to hide weapons in clothing and headgear of what students are currently wearing can hide weapons that are carried into the school and, if there are no metal detectors present, leaves an undeniable avenue for angry propensities.What has been considered one of the more conscionabl e reasons for the policy to implemented within the school system is the social preying that occur with many indigent students. Many students shine from impoverished family units and if they are unable to bear the latest trends and this is one of the shipway that students look to in an attempt at self-expression and definition. This is a huge agentive role in a childs psychological development and if there is a removal of this one barrier that students continually come up against, there is a marked emolument in both academic and social situations.This is really tied into the social outcome factor in as when there is only one type of dress needed for school, i. e. uniform, there is a higher instance of affordability amongst families that are simply unable to afford expensive, trendy clothing. The government has also taken an independent and unbiased tone-beginning to addressing this issue and it is compelling their overall interpretation of the current school system and its tie -in to student resort.The government believes that the adoption of school uniform policies can promote school rubber, improve discipline, and enhance the learning environment. The effectiveness benefits of school uniforms involve decreasing violence and theft even spartan situations among students over designer clothing or expensive sneakers helping veto gang members from wearing gang colors and insignia at school instill students with discipline helping parents and students resist peer pressure helping students cut back on their school work and helping school officials recognize intruders who come to the school (Government) There are currently many communities that have inflexible to adopt school uniform policies, which include California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, New York, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia and, many large school systems include Baltimore, Cincinnati, Dayton, Detroit, Los Angeles, recollective Beach, Miami, Milwaukee, Nashville, N ew Orleans, Phoenix, Seattle and St.Louis have school in either a voluntary or mandatory uniform policy in effect. There are many school boards in large and small cities that have adopted school uniform policies which include languish Beach, California Uniforms are mandatory in all basal and middle schools. Each school in the district determines the uniform its students go away wear. There is an opt-out of the program with parental consent. Currently the size of the program, implemented in 1994, includes 58,500 elementary and middle school students.Support for disadvantaged students Each school essential develop an assistance plan for families that cannot afford to buy uniforms. In most cases, graduating students either enterate or sell used uniforms to needy families. Results partition officials launch that in the year following implementation of the school uniform policy, overall school crime decreased 36 percentage, fights decreased 51 percent, sex offenses decreased 74 p ercent, weapons offenses decreased 50 percent, assault and electric battery offenses decreased 34 percent, and vandalism decreased 18 percent.Less than one percent of the students have elected to opt out of the uniform policy. Dick van Der Laan of the Long Beach Unified School District explained, We cant attribute the improvement exclusively to school uniforms, but we think its more than coincidental. According to Long Beach Police Chief William Ellis, Schools have fewer reasons to call the police. Theres less conflict among students. Students concentrate more on education, not on whose wearing $100 shoes or gang attire. Richmond, VirginiaThis voluntary uniform policy at Maymont Elementary School for the Arts and Humanities was implemented in 1994 with approximately 262 elementary school students enrolled. Support for disadvantaged students Responding to parent concerns about the cost of uniforms, the school sought corporation financial plump for for the uniform program. Largel y as a result of financial donations from businesses and other community leaders, the percentage of students wearing uniforms rose from 30 percent in 1994-95, the offset printing year of the program, to 85 percent during the current year.Results Maymont principal Sylvia Richardson identifies many benefits of the uniform program, including improved behavior, an increase in attendance rates and higher student achievement. In the examples shown above, both mandatory and voluntary uniform policies have be there is a correlation between violent behavior and school uniform policies and there are many variations of the mandatory school uniform policy which can be initiated between the school, the parent and the student. Carl A.Cohn writes that within the Long Beach school system, upon instituting a mandatory school uniform policy over two years prior, much of the public school educational establishment reacted skeptically. The school board was told by permissive parents, civil liberties stakes groups, timid legislators, and a biased news media that they would not let it happen. The school board initiated this program over 1 ? years ago with a 99 percent compliance rate in the program and a substantial decrease in school crime (Cohn). ConclusionEither being in favor or not in favor of mandatory school uniforms is a moot point as it is generally those who simply dont like to have their children conform to a mandatory policy or not, and, not for concrete and convincing reasons that wearing a school uniform decreases their childrens aptitude for learning, decreases their social status, or, even decreases their childs freedom of expression. Albeit some students, especially those in the higher grade levels oftentimes rebel by girls pulling their evades up above the regulated skirt length, this, is in no way a reflection on safety in school.One piece of evidence that is hard to refute is that studies have found that due to increased prevalence of school violence, one i n five-spot public school students feels less eager to go to school both day, one in seven feels less inclined to pay attending to learning in school, and one in 10 stays business firm from school or cuts class. In unsafe school environments, teachers cannot teach to their utmost potential, and students cannot learn to their full capability (Everett and Price).Paliokas and Rist note that for many individuals, the appeal of mandatory school uniforms is based on conventional wisdom and an intuitive tone that increased structure results in improved child behavior. Nevertheless, there is not much empirical info to support a cause-and-effect relationship between school uniforms and violence. Simply put, there are other variables which may, in fact, be a direct or indirect contributor to declines in levels of violence with or without school uniform policies.Paliokas and Rist posed several questions that essential first be answered before declines in school violence can be particul ar propositionally attributed to the implementation of school uniform programs a) was the implementation of the uniform policy only one aspect of a comprehensive safety plan that included heightened security and stricter rules? b) were local community-policing programs implemented at the same time? c) was the trend of violence in the school at its spinning top and ready to decline? d) was there an analysis of the trends of violence within that specific school or school district?e) were the decreases in school violence attributed to the Hawthorne Effect in which short-term attention to and visibility of a problem caused the decline? and, finally f) was parental involvement a crucial factor in the reduction of violence? (Paliokis and Rist). A large problem with the debate over school uniform policies and putting the emphasis on if implementing state policy was, in fact, in direct relation to curbing school violence is that although many school districts were privy to reduction in vi olence related to students, could there in fact be mitigating factors relative to the reduction.There is a need to look to finding empirical evidence in support of a mandatory uniform policy through the gathering of a variety of independent studies including 1) Investigate parent, teacher, and student perceptions regarding school uniforms and violence prevention. 2) heading analyses to determine whether any decline in violence represents true change or predictable change in trend within the school and/or school district. 3) Must be statistically control for workable intervening variables associated with violence reduction to determine cause-and-effect relationships between school uniforms and violence reduction.4) Compare the prevalence of violence in schools mandating uniforms with schools mandating dress codes. 5) Obtain data from both experimental groups (those require to wear uniforms) and control groups (those not required to wear uniforms). 6) Examination of how schools man dating uniforms address the issue of providing school uniforms to low-income families. 7) Focus on identifying the means to adequately evaluate the effect of mandatory uniform programs on the prevalence of school violence (Paliokas and Rist)Works Cited Paliokas KL, Rist RC. Do They Reduce Violence Or Just Make Us Feel Better? Online. http//www. edweek. org/we/vol-15/28rist. h15. April 3, 1996. Cohn CA. Mandatory school uniforms Long Beachs pioneering experience finds safety and economic benefits. School Admin. 1996 53(2)22-25. King, K. A. Should school uniforms be mandated in elementary school? 1998. Online http//dane sugar. wicip. org/ncs/forumuniformseval. htm PSParents. net. Pros of Mandatory School Uniforms.Online at http//psparents. net/ in_support. htm United States Government. School Uniforms Where They Are and Why They Work? Online http//www. ed. gov/updates/uniforms. html American Psychological Association. Violence and Youth Psychologys Response, Volume 1 Summary stem of the American Psychological Association Commission on Violence and Youth. Washington, DC American Psychological Association 199342. Callahan CM, Rivara FP. Urban high school youthfulness and handguns. JAMA. 19922673038-3032.