Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Family Power Debate
Affirmative for classless overlap of the family index finger base. The family has consensus over who has the ultimate say on the day to day decisions. Present day family has very complex type of bodily structure which affects the force outbase determination. A family consisting of a mother (female), father (male), and a child or two will fork over a very assorted designer base than a family consisting of two same gender p atomic number 18nts or a family that has a single p atomic number 18nt. Age of the pargonnts and the children also contributes toward power base when the children are very young, the parents have the power and when the children grow they have their own control.Different cultures have varied family structure based on what they have learned from their parents and grandparents. socioeconomic status and educational level also contributes to the powerbase in a family. counterbalance though all these factors contribute toward the powerbase, it makes a difference, especially in deference to health care management and family wellness. An adult family member remains to be the traditional base of power in several families which the whole family must(prenominal)iness accept to make the authority effective.For example, according to Hoffman as cited by Friedman et al (2003), in a traditional nuclear family the husband still maintains more decision-making power over his married woman and that parents almost always have more power than children (p. 299). The following statement challenges that this idea is not the healthiest balance in todays diverse family surroundings.Affirmative StatementI propose that an egalitarian share-out of power in todays environment will create healthy family functioning. No change in the American Family is mentioned more often than the gradual shift from one-sided male authority to the sharing of family power by the husband and wife. Declining sex role traditionalism, like many social changes, correlates with c hange magnitude complexity and conflict in family decision making (Friedman, 2003). It is often laboured in todays time to get two individuals to pit to the same values. With the economy the way it is currently it takes two incomes to keep a family a float.With two incomes needed this often times leads to the husband and wife sharing the power in other words and egalitarian constitution ofpower sharing. This sharing of power go outs from the husband and wife working different hours to provide care for the children at all times. Another reason this sharing of power occurs is that the females in todays society want to shade equal in their relationships, fueling the need for recognition and equal sharing of power in a family structure. An advantage to this view is that structure must be carefully assessed and recognized prior to distinguishing powerbase.Family function the intimate, interactive and interdependent sharing of values, decisions, and commitment over time (Kaakinen, G edaly-Duff, Coehlo, Harmon-Hanson, 2010, p. 22) determines structure and therefore establishes powerbase. In the healthy family, with an equal powerbase is not only perception but a reflection of these values and consideration of leadership and justice. In a family whose perceptions are based on bullying, domineering leadership or abuse, powerbase is reflected by actions perpetrate in fear of punishment and retribution.The opposite is true when the structure of the power is based on equal sharing of decisions and actions as a result of this family interaction structure. This view considers the positive or negative family interactions (structure) to affect the look of family members and that powerbase derives recognition from these interactions. What may be considered as perception of the power-holder(s) in family is genuinely the result of the positive or negative family behavior in result to structure. In a study done by Schoppe, Mangelsdorf, & Frosch, (2001), powerbase is dete rmined by family structure.SolutionPowerbase can connote failed impressions as well. Outward assessment of inward reciprocal support processes are the family system as it exists and as it functions. Changes in what is occurring are changes in support processes as well as actual changes in how individuals exist and experience. Powerbase within the family in a healthy or non-healthy environment is determined by family structure, if the powerbase is shared equally by the adults a discontinue example will be demonstrated and mimicked by the children ( Kaakinen, 2012).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.